My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03925
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03925
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:11:53 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:11:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Jefferson
Park
Community
Buffalo Creek
Basin
South Platte
Title
Buffalo Creek Flood Mitigation Plan
Date
11/1/1996
Prepared For
Jefferson County
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Mitigation/Flood Warning/Watershed Restoration
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />metal can help to protect the building from a fire. A roofmg material such as cedar shake shingles <br />will reduce the chance of the building's survival. Exterior finishes such as brick or stucco are more <br />fire resistant than finishes such as wood siding or logs. <br /> <br />Fuel Breaks <br />Fuel breaks, as the name implies, provide a line of defense where a fire theoretically will not cross <br />and continue to bum on the other side of the break. A roadway can be used as the basis for a fuel <br />break, combined with forest thinning on one or both sides of the road. The required width of <br />thinning depends on factors such as topography and fuel type. The minimum recommended width <br />for a fuel break is 200 feet. <br /> <br />Forest Wide Thinning <br />The objectives of forest wide thinning are to reduce fuel loading, increase forest health, and <br />improve aesthetics. In dense forests, fires quickly change from relatively harmless ground fires to <br />catastrophic crown fires because of the "fuel ladder" effect. In a thinned forest, the fire will likely <br />stay a ground fire, and will probability do little damage. <br /> <br />5. Watershed Recovery <br />The natural recovery of the burned areas in the Buffalo Creek vicinity could be a long process. <br />Fortunately, with the aggressive reclamation actions by the U.S. Forest Service and the Colorado <br />State Forest Service, the initial stages of the recovery should be enhanced and accelerated. The <br />hydrologic response of the burned watersheds will depend on the level of vegetative and soil <br />surface recovery. Following are some key phases to the recovery process: <br /> <br />. Break-up of hydrophobic (water repellent) soils <br />. Recovery of native grasses, forbs, and shrubs <br />. Recovery of native trees <br />. Recovery of humus layer (organic layer at soil surface) <br /> <br />The effects of an intense fire on the watershed's soil structure and hydrology can be significant. <br />The following key points about the effects of fire on soil and hydrology were extracted from U.S. <br />Forest Service publications. <br /> <br />. For arid areas of the southwestern U.S., vegetative regrowth after a severe burning can be <br />very slow. <br />· Coarse textured soils are more likely to become highly water repellent than fine clay soils. <br />. Lodgepole and Ponderosa Pine forests have displayed high water repellency after burning. <br />· Soil formed from granitic parent material are sensitive to erosion. The erosion rate is a <br />function of the burn intensity. <br />. For a recently burned watershed, peak streamflows have been reported to be 2 to 60 times <br />greater than normal after a heavy rain. <br /> <br />28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.