My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03925
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03925
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2010 10:11:53 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:11:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Jefferson
Park
Community
Buffalo Creek
Basin
South Platte
Title
Buffalo Creek Flood Mitigation Plan
Date
11/1/1996
Prepared For
Jefferson County
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Mitigation/Flood Warning/Watershed Restoration
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />4, Inform Local Officials <br />Each step is critical in the process of recognizing that a flood threat exists and in determining the <br />magnitude of flooding. This chapter discusses these steps in relation to the basic types of local <br />flood warning systems now in use, <br /> <br />Tvpes of Local Flood Warning Svstems <br />There are two basic classifications of local flood warning systems available for community use: <br />manual systems, which are relatively simple and inexpensive, and automated systems, which use <br />state-of-art automated data collection, warning transmission systems, and computers to provide <br />flood forecasts, There are many variations within these two basic types, <br /> <br />The basic concept of a local flood warning system is simple. River and rainfall data are collected <br />upstream from a community, Data are then transmitted to a central collection point. This <br />information is used to predict the magnitude of expected flooding, where flooding will occur, and <br />when flooding will begin. <br /> <br />Manual local flood forecast systems consist of: (I) a data collection system; (2) a community <br />flash flood coordinator; (3) a simple-to-use flood forecast procedure; and (4) a communication <br />network to distribute warnings to appropriate emergency response officials, including the mass <br />media and the National Weather Service (NWS), The forecast system should be linked to a <br />community response system, <br /> <br />Automated local flood warning systems consist of the following components: (I) automated <br />precipitation and river gages; (2) a communication system; (3) automated data collection and <br />processing equipment;(4) data collection and system forecasting software; and (5) a warning <br />distribution system, <br /> <br />Automated stream forecasting has developed in the past decade as a result of rapid growth in the <br />application of hydrologic models to computer technology, coupled with decreases in the cost of <br />computers, The evolutionary development of automated systems continues to improve the <br />accuracy, timeliness, and reliability of flood warning capability, Automated flood warning <br />systems are gaining in popularity around the nation, <br /> <br />Automated system operation may vary from a simple flash flood alarm that audibly announces <br />imminent flooding, to the continuous computerized analysis of precipitation and streamflow and <br />a hydrologic model to forecast flood levels, <br /> <br />Manual Svstems <br />The most common flood warning systems are manual or self-help systems that typically use <br />volunteer observers and inexpensive equipment to collect data. Data transmission is normally by <br />phone, The following table lists the advantages and disadvantages of a manual system, <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.