My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03888
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03888
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:44:39 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:09:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
388
County
Summit
Community
Unincorporated Summit County
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Title
Flood Insurance Study - Summit County, CO, Unincorporated Areas
Date
11/1/1994
Designation Date
11/1/1994
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />drainage area versus peak flow rate with each line representing <br />all values of the same frequency event. <br /> <br />For smaller basins (less than 30 square miles), the rainfall <br />events were investigated using the Soil Conservation Service <br />(SCS) TR-20 model. The 500-year peak flow due to rainfall was <br />found to be much higher than the SOO-year peak flow due to <br />snowmelt. The 50-, 100-, and SOO-year regression lines were <br />modified to incorporate the discharge versus drainage area <br />relationship obtained by the SCS procedure. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The Master Drainage Plan for Breckenridge (Reference 32), <br />prepared in 1986, contains a statistical analysis of 21 <br />individual gage stations. A regional frequency analysis, similar <br />to the analysis described in Reference 6, was performed to <br />determine if the peak discharge values from Reference 6 were <br />still representative. The results from the 1986 Master Plan <br />Study as compared to the FEMA values were in close agreement; <br />therefore, the peak discharge values were considered still valid. <br />Formulas were derived for the 10-, 50-, and 100-year recurrence <br />intervals. The tributaries to the Blue River, which have <br />drainage areas ranging from 0.8 to 11.1 square miles, were <br />analyzed using the HEC-l computer model. The HEC-l run provided <br />runoff rates produced by rainfall. The results indicated that <br />the peak flow rates for the lower return periods, such as the <br />lO-year, were dominated by snowmelt values as calculated using <br />the regional regression analysis. For the SO- and lOO-year <br />floods, the HEC-l results were adopted as peak flow rates. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />The peak flow rates used in this study were either taken directly <br />from previous Flood Insurance Studies or other studies, derived <br />from other frequencies using log-probability plots, or calculated <br />using regression equations from previously referenced studies <br />(for small basins regression lines were adjusted to consider <br />rainfall effects). <br /> <br />The peak diSCharge-drainage area relationships for the Blue <br />River, French Gulch, Jug Creek, Meadow Creek, Miners Creek, No <br />Name Creek, North Fork Snake River, Snake River, South Barton <br />Gulch, Swan River, and Tenmile Creek are shown in Table 4. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />The revised hydraulic analyses of the streams studied using <br />detailed methods were performed using the USACE HEC-2 step- <br />backwater program (Reference 33). <br /> <br />Starting water-surface elevations (SWSELs) for the following <br />streams were calculated using the slope-area method: Blue River <br />(above Dillon Reservoir), Tenmile Creek (lower portion), Meadow <br />Creek (lower portion), Miners Creek, French Gulch, and South <br />Barton Gulch. For the following streams, the SWSELs were chosen <br />based on coincident peaks: Swan and North Fork Snake Rivers, Jug <br />Creek, and No Name Creek. The SWSELs for Tenmile Creek (upper <br />portion), Meadow Creek (upper portion), the Snake River, and the <br /> <br />31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.