Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />a <br />9 <br />] <br />3 <br />~ <br />9 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />~ <br />g <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />39 <br /> <br />Equilibrium Slope <br />The Meyer-Peter and Muller bed-load equation is one of many mathe- <br />matical expressions used to analyze and predict the movement of noncoheslve <br />sediment in rlvers. It is selected here because of its simplicity and not <br />foranyadd1tlonalintrfns1cvaluefthasoverotherequatlons. The <br />equation was developed from flume experiments with water depths ranging <br />from 0.3 to 4 feet and slopes from 0.0004 to 0.02. The mean size of the <br />sediments were varied from O.4,ml11imeters (medium sand) to 30 millimeters <br />(coarse gravel). It has been criticized as predicting too much sediment <br />transport in gravel bed rivers. <br />For situations in which no bed forms occur in essentially one- <br />dimensional uniform flow, the Meyer-Peter and Muller equation can be written <br />" <br /> <br />q.= ass {.9.)l/2[01l3 q3/5i11/10s7/l0_0,047(S _ <br />~ (Ss _ I) y . Y -m s <br /> <br />lh~]3/2 <br />(1) <br /> <br />in which qs = transport rate of bed material per unit width of channel, <br />lb/sfft <br /> <br />5, . specific weight of the sediment <br />9 . acceleration due to gravity, ft/s2 <br />, . unit weight of water, lb/ft3 <br /> <br />q ~ water discharge rate per unit width of channel, ft3/s/ft <br />~ = effective diameter of the sediment, ft <br />S = riverbed slope. <br />To arrive at this expression, use has been made of the Manning equation <br />1.486 y513 Sl/2 <br />, <br /> <br />(2) <br /> <br />q. <br /> <br />in which y '" uniform depth of flow, ft <br />n = Manning's roughness coefficient <br /> <br />end the roughness predictor <br />n"0.039SC\nl/6 <br /> <br />(3) <br /> <br />Under conditions of uniform steady flow of water and sediment in a <br />one~dimens1onal channel, the equilibrium slope is then <br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />5 . <br /> <br />Ss - 1 2/3 Il/3 2/3 <br />[f ass) (g) qs +0.047(Ss <br />0.113yq3/5dn,1/l0 <br /> <br />(,) <br /> <br />10/7 <br />1h<\.] <br /> <br />When the bed load transport is large, the term 0.047 (Ss - l)ydm is small <br />in comparison with the other term in the numerator of Equation~. Con- <br />versely, when the bed transport is small (qs ~ O), Equation 4 reduces to <br />S=0.286(Ss_l)10/7dn,9/7q-6/7 (5) <br />which is the expression for the bed slope of a straight gravel bed channel <br />with no bed forms and uniform constant flow. <br />In order to solve the degradation problem mathematically, one other <br />relation is needed. that being how the bed material size changes as the bed <br />degrades. For the South Platte River in the study reach, it is generally <br />found that the material underlying the riverbed is some combination of sand, <br />gravel and cobbles. Ho shale outcrops were observed in the reaches upstream <br />or downstream from the channelized reaches. These alluvial materials were <br />transportedina larger llnd different river in past time and are not un i- <br />formly distributed. Knowledge of the sizes of these underlying materials is <br />scanty. The logs of the holes drilled for the exploration of bridge <br />foundations state merely what materials were present but not their size <br />distributions. <br /> <br />Because of the probable lack of spatial uniformity in underlying bed <br />material, the lack of any samples from below the surface for which the size <br />distributions are known and the non-uniformity of the material on the sur- <br />face of the bed, no conclusive value of the amount of degradation antici~ <br />pated in the South Platte Ri~er can be drawn at this time. However, the <br />equations were employed to study the range of possible conditions which could <br />arise. The findings are as follows: <br /> <br />1. Shown in Figure 10. the bed material samples taken from the South <br />Platte Ri~er range in size from medium sand to very coarse gravel. <br />The average of all these samples is a very fine gravel which <br />according to the method of Gessler (1971). will degrade and anmor <br />under conditions predicted for the future. <br /> <br />The median diameter of the armor coat would increase from 2.2 <br />millimeters to approximately 15 millimeters under an applied shearing <br />stress of 0.4 pounds per square foot. This stress would occur when <br />the unit discharge is on the order of 25 cubic feet per second per <br />foot of channel width. <br /> <br />2. The computed size of the bed material needed to form a stable armor <br />coat on the riverbed for a design discharge of 33.000 cubic feet per <br />second in a 2SD-foot wide channel is in the order of 3.5 inches in <br />diameter. This size exists beneath the ri~er bed. <br />