Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />augmented by snowmelt from the mountains. Lesser floods are caused by snow- <br />melt or isolated rainstorms which cover only a small portion of the catch- <br />ment. <br /> <br />annual floods is 4900 cubic feet per second. The mean of the logs of the <br />peak diSCharges is 3500 cubic feet per second. <br />Prlor to the closure Of the flood control dams. the lOO-year flood <br />was approximately 30,000 cubic feet per second in Denver. Since the com. <br />pletlon of the Chatfield and Bear Creek Dams, the lOO-year flood in Denver <br />is expected to be lower. To detennine the new f~quency distribution would <br />require the routing of these floods with known return periods listed 1n <br />Table 5 through the reservoirs. The combined outflows would have the same <br />returnperlod as the peak flows. In 1974, the Corps of Engineers estilll1lted <br />a peak of 15,000 cubic feet per second as the 100.year flood with dams. <br />The Urban Drainage and Flood COntrol District has updated this estilll1l tein <br />1983 and predicts a lOa-year peak flow of 22,000 cubic feet per second at <br />the Denver gage. <br />The main channel can handle 16,000 cubic feet per second in Denver <br />before appreciable overbank flooding occurs. The operating rules for the <br />three flood control reservoirs call for the maintenance of the flow in the <br />South Platte River at Henderson to a value less or equal to 5000 cubic feet <br />per second. The Corps of Engineers monitors 11 gaging stations and <br />operates the outlet gates in accordance with the reservoir levels and the <br />knowledge of the incoming discharges. <br />Henderson. The annual maximum instantaneous discharges at the U.S. <br />Geological Survey's streamgaging station at Henderson are 1isted in Table 6. <br />The sequence of peaks is plotted ~n Figure 7. The drainage area for the <br />station is 4,713 square miles. <br />Flood peaks in the South Platte River at Henderson are different <br />than at Denver. There is a large amount of floodplain storage between the <br />two sites which decreases the magnitude of peaks between Denver and <br />Henderson (Gingery Associates, Inc., 1977). Also there are the additions <br />of flows from Clear Creek and Sand Creek which increase the magnitude of <br />peaks downstream from Denver. The mean of the annual flood peaks at <br />Henderson is 5590 cubic feet per second which is nearly 700 cubic feet per <br />second JI'Ore than at Denver. The mean of the logs of the peak discharges is <br />3940 cubic feet per second. <br />The largest peak occurred in the South Platte River at Henderson <br />in May 1973. Themagnitude..as 33,000 cubic feet per second, almost double <br />that at Denver. <br />The second largest peak ..as the June 1965 flood when the flow reached <br />29,600 cubic feet per second. This value is much less than the peak of <br />40,300 cubic feet per second which passed Denver on the same day. <br /> <br />The flood records for the South Platte River reflect the influence <br />of man. During the snowmelt months, May and June, water is stored in the <br />mountain reservoirs and diverted from the rivers into storage on the high <br />plains. Small annual peaks can be decreased 9reatly by diversions. Since <br />the construction of the flood control reservoirs on Bear Creek, Cherry <br />Creek and the South Platte at Chatfield, the frequency of occurrence of <br />flooding is expected to decrease. The source of major floods in the South <br />Platte will be severe rainfall on the urban area and on the catchments of <br />Clear Creek and Sand Creek. <br />Appreciable or severe flooding has occurred in the Denver area in <br />1844,1864,1876,1894,1912,1921,1933,1935,1942,1949,1965,1969 and <br />1973 (Gingery Associates. Inc., 1977; Hatthai, 1969). <br />Denver. The annual maximum instantaneous discharges at the U.S. <br />Geolojical Survey's streamgage in Denver (catchment area = 3,804 square <br />miles are listed in Table 5 and plotted in Figure 7. <br />The largest flood was the June 1965 disaster. Fourteen inches of <br />rain fell on one tributary in seven hours. Historical information indicates <br />that the 1965 peak discharge 40,300 cubic feet per second at Denver ..as <br />the greateit since at least 1844 (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban <br />Development, 1976). The entire flow in Cherry Creek upstream from the <br />Cherry Creek Dam was stored in the reservoir. The peak inflow to the <br />reservoir was estimated as 10,100 cubic feet per second (Corps of Engineers, <br />1974). Without the Cherry Creek Dam, the flood peak at Denver would have <br />been larger. Immediately upstream at littleton, the peak discharge for this <br />June flood was estimated at 110,000 cubic feet per second. <br />The fourth largest flood peak, caused by rainfall on the high <br />plains and foothills and snow in the mountains, occurred in May 1973. The <br />peak of 18.500 cubic feet per second at Denver is that quoted in many reports, <br />for example, Corps of Engineers (1973). The U.S. Geological Survey lists <br />17,600 cubic feet per second for this peak. <br />A superficial search of the flood records indicated that all the <br />largest floods at Denver ..ere the result mainly of rainfall. Snowmelt con. <br />trlbuted to some peaks but not toa great extent. AsshowninTab1e5,at <br />least 60 percent of the peaks were completely or mostly the result of rain. <br />Other floods not designated "rain" may have been indeed caused by rain. More <br />study is required to dete~ine th~ causes of the floods for which there are <br />no remarks in Table 5. <br />The flood frequency curve for the Denver streamgage on the South <br />Platte River is shown in Figure8,forthePeriod1895to1974,theyea r <br />prior to the closure of the Chatfield Dam. There are 77 annual peaks. <br />Clearly the floods are from a mixed distr1buti?n. A compouryd 109:nonnal <br />distribution has been fitted to the plotted pOlnts. The arlthmetlc mean of <br /> <br />A flood of 14,800 cubic feet per second occurred at Henderson in <br />1957 ..hen none occurred at Denver. Conversely, there was no flood recorded <br />at Henderson in 1933, when a peak of 22,000 cubic feet per second was <br />recorded at Denver. <br />