Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />A number of obstacles can stand in the way of <br />adopting mitigation techniques. For instance, <br />some measures are resisted because they appear to <br />thrcaten thc cconomic or political interests of <br />important groups in a community. Understanding <br />these intercsts and local political processes is <br />essential. <br />Traditional practices and cultural meanings are <br />also a source of resistance. People may refuse to <br />move from especially vulnerable locations solely <br />for sentimental reasons. And traditional practices <br />that contribute to vulnerability - like develop- <br />ment of seashore property in hurricane areas - <br />may continuc even when a danger is realized. <br />Understanding local tradition and leadership <br />often helps negotiations in these instances. <br />Difficulties also arise in communicating warn- <br />ings and other disaster information to various <br />populations in a community. Warnings are some- <br />times delayed or information 011 hazardous condi- <br />tions withheld because of an uncertain public <br />response. A warning given too early Ot a false <br />alarm may cause people to doubt subsequent <br />warnings; yct mass panic - though relatively rare <br />- could ensue from a last-minute warning. Much <br />remains to be learned about how to ensure that <br />disaster information is understood and responded <br />to constructively. <br />Mitigation measures are designed with the <br />future in mind and frequently show no immediate <br />benefits. This gives rise to the problem of discover- <br />ing and cultivating incentives for organizations <br />and individuals to undertake hazard reduction <br />programs. Even after initial steps are taken, <br />sustaining interest and preparedness during ex- <br />tended periods between disasters requires careful <br />study. <br />Further, responsibilities for hazard reduction <br />and emergency response are distributed among <br />many organizations and government agencies. <br />This disparateness impedes coordination of <br />efforts and often impedes effective hazard mitiga- <br />tion. Though a good deal of research has been <br />devoted to finding ways to facilitate coordination, <br />much remains to be learned. <br />Potential projects during the IDNHR include: <br /> <br />~ development of guidelines for establishing <br />acceptable risk and selccting hazard reduction <br />strategies under varied economic and so- <br />ciocultural conditions; <br />~ a wide-ranging comparative study of the eco- <br /> <br />47 <br /> <br /> <br />His face etched with concern, a <br />Hitchcock, Texas, resident <br />surveys the damage to his <br />flooded homestead in the wake <br />of Hurricane Alicia's torrential <br />rains in August 1983. Long <br />after skies clear and debris is <br />removed, a disaster's impact <br />can continue, crippling the <br />local economy and straining <br />the community cohesion <br />needed to face future risks. <br />