My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03837
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03837
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:44:29 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:06:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Confronting Natural Disasters
Date
11/2/1987
Prepared By
Natural Resource Council
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />~ establishment of a cooperative international <br />program in strong motion measurement and data <br />analysis; <br />~ organization of a coordinated international <br />earthquake information service; <br />~ development of new earthquake prediction <br />models; <br />~ study of the timing and methods for effective <br />delivery of earthquake warnings; <br />~ assessment of technical considerations in <br />strengthening brittle reinforced-concrete build- <br />ings and other hazardous structures; <br />~ study of the international financial and insur- <br />ance implications of catastrophic earthquakes; <br />~ improvement of techniques to control non- <br />structural damage (for example, ceilings, parti- <br />tions, windows, and other interior fixtures); <br />~ analysis of various strategies for preparedness <br />and response to earthquakes; <br />~ study of failure modes of structures; <br />~ study of the special concerns in designing, <br />constructing, and rehabilitating critical facilities; <br />~ improvement of guidelines for earthquake- <br />resistant design; <br />~ preparation of unified risk maps that include <br />hazard potential, frequency of occurrence, ex- <br />pected ground motions, and site variations; <br />~ study of microzonation in worldwide seis- <br />motecronic analogs; <br />. development of seismic-safety analyses for <br />existing dams and nuclear power facilities; and <br />~ continued studies of seismic gaps (faults with <br />no recent activities) and their implications. <br /> <br />LANDSLIDES <br /> <br />Landslides occur in virtually every country in the <br />world, and they have a variety of causes: heavy <br />rains, melting snow or ice, earthquakes, vol- <br />canoes, and human activities. Landslides often <br />extend beyond the bounds of a single state or <br />country, burying homes and other structures and <br />disrupting transport and the delivery of emer- <br />gency servIces. <br />Notable landslides of the recent past include the <br />Reventador, Ecuador, landslides of March 1987. A <br />magnitude 6.9 earthquake following a month of <br />heavy rains precipitated landslides scouring the <br />slopes of Mount Reventador. Early estimates show <br />1,000 dead and 4,000 missing. In addition, the <br /> <br />35 <br /> <br />event ruptured the trans-Ecuador oil pipeline - <br />the nation's prime economic asset - causing an <br />approximate $1.5 billion loss. In 1962 and 1970, <br />disastrous slides plunged from the slopes of <br />Mount Huascaran in Peru. In the 1970 event, <br />caused by a 7.8 magnitude earthquake, nearly <br />20,000 died as mudflows buried the nearby towns <br />of Yungay and Ranrahirca. In the United States, <br />the April 1983 thaw of a heavy snow pack <br />precipated a landslide near Thistle, Utah, which <br />caused more than $200 million in direct losses, <br />cutting two major highways and a transcontinen- <br />tal rail link and damming the Spanish Fork River. <br />Landsliding in the United States causes at least <br />$1-2 billion in economic losses and 25-50 deaths <br />each year. Despite a growing understanding of the <br />geology of landslides and a rapidly developing <br />engineering capabiliry for landslide control, losses <br />continue to increase. This rise is largely a con- <br />sequence of residential and commercial develop- <br />ment that continues to expand onto the steeply <br />sloping or unstable terrain that is most prone to <br />landslides. <br />There are methods for mitigating landslide <br />losses. Land use management, building and grad- <br />ing codes, the use of well-designed engineering <br />techniques for landslide control and stabilization, <br />the timely issuance of emergency warnings, and <br />the availability of landslide insurance can signifi- <br />cantly reduce the catastrophic effects of land- <br />slides. Though some techniques for predicting <br />landslides have been developed, research in this <br />area is insufficient. For example, recurrence inter- <br />val techniques and other temporal descriptions of <br />risk are essentially unexplored. Some research has <br />been carried out on the use of early warning <br />systems to alert the public to individual local <br />landslides, and there have been a few successful <br />demonstrations. But there has never been exten- <br />sive implementation of an early warning system in <br />any country. <br />Successful and cost-effective landslide mitiga- <br />tion programs can be implemented, and such <br />programs do exist Uapan, for example). Though <br />there have been some impressive local demonstra- <br />tions of landslide control in other countries, <br />information about them has not been widely <br />disseminated. <br />Nonetheless, much can be done to reduce <br />landslide losses everywhere. There are obvious <br />needs for geologic and engineering research, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.