Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />merce must be maintained. The acts of regulating <br />land use and siting facilities based on potential <br />hazard or the consequences of their failure go <br />right to the heart of how a community functions. <br />Hazard considerations are but a part - often <br />ignored - of the overall decision process. Much <br />remains to be learned about effectively integrating <br />land use strategies into economic development, <br />but experience from many communities shows <br />that even simple restrictions on the use of flood <br />plains, as mentioned above, can reduce the con- <br />sequences of flooding. <br />Controlling building practices offers one of the <br />most effective approaches to limiting the effects of <br />natural hazards. When a structure is designed, <br />constructed, and maintained to resist a hazard, <br />then the hazard has little or no impact. But the <br />design of a structure to withstand a hazardous <br />event is not a simple matter. What forces will the <br />structure encounter, How will its different ele- <br />ments interact' How will the construction mate- <br />rials perform, These are questions the engineer <br />must answer. <br />Many empirical rules have evolved to aid the <br />engineer in constructing buildings that perform <br />well during natural hazards. However, building <br />practices throughout the world are developing <br />rapidly, creating both new dangers and new. <br />opportunities. Some improved construction tech- <br />niques have already proved their worth. For <br />example, using cement mortar rather than lime! <br />sand mortar, using reinforcing steel, and attach- <br />ing diaphragms to walls can reduce the vul- <br />nerability of masonry buildings from almost <br />certain collapse in an earthquake to one of modest <br />or light damage. Similarly, attaching the roof to <br />the walls and the walls to the foundation of a <br />wood frame house can greatly reduce wind de- <br />struction during hurricanes, cyclones, and tor- <br />nadoes. <br />But rapid change in construction practices also <br />poses new dangers. Techniques are often applied <br />far from where they were developed, without <br />regard to their limitations. Further, their perform- <br />ance may be conjectural, not understood from <br />actual experience. Only observations of actual <br />performance in the field - combined with labora- <br />tory research - can validate new methods. Such <br />investigations do not yield results easily or <br />quickly. <br />Among the principal tools for safe construction <br /> <br /> <br />Like dol/houses slumped ill <br />salld, these reill{orced concrete <br />apartment buildillgs in Niigata, <br />Japan, tilted precipitously, but <br />remailled illtact ill JUlie 1964 <br />whel1 a magnitude 7.5 <br />earthquake "liquefied" the soil <br />bel1eath them, causillg them to <br />subSIde. Durillg strong groulld <br />shakillg, areas with salldy soils <br />alld a high water table call <br />temporarily lose strength alld <br />behave like fluids, a <br />phenomenon known as <br />liquefaction. <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br />z <br />~ <br />" <br />o <br />I <br />~ <br />" <br />~ <br />o <br />~ <br />" <br />