Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />CHAPTER 3 <br /> <br />the impacts of natural hazards. When several are <br />pursued together, they can reduce a hazard's <br />impact from a catastrophe to a moderate disrup- <br />tion. The best mix of actions depends on the <br />hazards faced by a community, the availability of <br />scientific knowledge, and the resources and goals <br />of the community. What is effective in one situa- <br />tion or hazard may not work in another. For <br />instance, tolerating physical damage from a hur- <br />ricane might be appropriate for a large nation <br />whose economy will likely decline only a few <br />tenths of a percent from hurricane losses. But such <br />a strategy is inappropriate for a tiny country like <br />Dominica, where a single hurricane engulfed the <br />island and affected every community in 1979. <br />Likewise, a single earthquake affected virtually <br />the entire industrial production of Nicaragua in <br />1972. <br />Whatever the strategy, avoiding disasters must <br />include anticipation of the hazard's impacts. Yet <br />most measures now in use to cope with natural <br />hazards are reactive: fire fighting, search and res- <br />cue, emergency medical care, debris clearance, <br />provision of food and temporary shelter, and <br />provisions for temporary water supply and waste <br />disposal. These emergency response measures <br />may be planned in advance but are not put into <br />effect until after a disaster occurs. It is clear, <br />however, that major reductions in losses of life and <br />property can only come when the emphasis shifts <br />from reaction to anticipation. Emergency re- <br />sponse and postdisaster relief are important and <br />will still be needed, but on a declining scale as <br />disaster preparedness, hazard-conscious land use <br /> <br /> <br />The Hazard <br />Reduction Process <br /> <br />A common theme in the Chapter 2 case studies is <br />that disasters can be avoided or minimized <br />through application of science and technology. <br />Without it, disasters are likely to increase as the <br />pressures of population and commerce encourage <br />the use of more hazard-prone areas. <br />Science and technology applications that can be <br />used to avoid disasters are of two types, physical <br />adjustments and social adjustments. Physical ad- <br />justments for avoiding a hazard's impacts include: <br /> <br />. planning and building to withstand a hazard, <br />~ identifying and avoiding the sites where a <br />hazard is likely to occur, <br />~ predicting the occurrence of a hazard, and <br />~ preventing or altering a hazard's characteris- <br />tics. <br /> <br />Social adjustments for avoiding a hazard's im- <br />pacts consist of: <br /> <br />. restricting the uses of land and establishing <br />minimum standards for avoiding hazardous sites <br />and conditions; <br />~ instituting public awareness campaigns in <br />areas prone to hazards; <br />~ initiating emergency preparedness programs <br />to protect life and property once a warning is <br />issued or an event occurs; <br />~ spreading the economic loss among a larger <br />population through insurance, taxation, and <br />monetary grants; and <br />~ reconstructing a community so that it is less <br />vulnerable to the next hazard. <br /> <br />These avoidance strategies substantially alter <br /> <br />19 <br />