My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03800
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03800
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:44:23 PM
Creation date
10/5/2006 12:04:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Development of A Drainage and Flood Control Management Program for Urbanizing Communities - Part I
Date
9/1/1978
Prepared By
CSU Environmental Resources Center
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />10 <br /> <br />The recommended Financial element developed from these legal <br />requirements is represented by a flow of decisions and money as <br />illustrated in Figure 11-1. The element is divided into two functional <br />components: Cost Apportionment and Cost Adjustment. <br />Cost Apportionment -- The apportionment process begins after a <br />reasonable drainage plan has been prepared. From this plan, the <br />project costs are estimated and the special and general benefits <br />are computed. If the total benefits are less than the total costs, <br />and the nonquantifiable aspects of the project (aesthetics, political <br />issues, etc.) do not override the economic analysis, the project is not <br />viable and the process is terminated. If the project is viable, the <br />process divides into financial actions and planning actions. <br />1. Financial actions: <br />a) The special and general portions of project cost are <br />computed. <br />b) The general portion is apportioned to the community <br />through encumbrances on the general fund, issuance of <br />general obligation bonds, etc. (see Ref. 12 for a review <br />of the various general financing alternatives). <br />c) The special portion is apportioned to developers as <br />they request subdivision plat approval using anyone of <br />a number of allocation formulas (see Ref. 22 and 23). <br />The writer recommends an allocation formula based on <br />land area and land use. It includes the major hydrolo- <br />gic factors, yet is simple enough for easy computation <br />and administration. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.