My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03743
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03743
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:28:10 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:58:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
25th Annual Celebration Hazards Research and Applications Workshop
Date
7/9/2000
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Tuesdav. Julv 11. continued <br /> <br />Flagstaff Room <br /> <br />Sunshine Room <br /> <br />SugarloafRoom <br /> <br />2. ACCEPTABLE RISK PROCEDURES FOR EVALUATING NATURAL <br />HAZARD MITIGATION <br />Moderator: Craig Taylor, Natural Hazards Management, Inc. <br />Discussants: <br />David Goldman, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers <br />Keith Porter, Stanford University <br />Bill Cain, East Bay Municipal Utility District <br />Elliott Mittler, University of Wisconsin, Green Bay <br />Dick Wittkop, Moffat & Nichol Engineers <br />Recorder: Lisa Bona, GeoEngineers, Inc. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Acceptable risk procedures are emerging as more comprehensive methods of evaluating <br />natural hazards mitigation. Less comprehensive methods have typicalIy been incorporated <br />into engineering practices related to new construction and reconstruction. However, many <br />policy-related questions have arisen with respect to the application of acceptable risk <br />procedures-for example, "in whose time frame" and "in what segment of society" are such <br />risks "acceptable?" This session discusses some of these major issues. <br /> <br />3. THE PUBLIC ENTITY RISK INSTITUTE <br />Moderator: Gerry Hoetmer, Public Entity Risk Institute <br />Discussants: <br />Laurie Johnson. Risk Management Solutions, Inc. <br />Claire Reiss, Public Entity Risk Institute <br />Recorder: Arriella Chakos, City of Berkeley, California <br /> <br />The Public Entity Risk Institute (pERI) is a relatively new organization that focuses on <br />promoting good risk management practices among local government, small businesses, and <br />nonprofit organizations. Specifically, it facilitates the development and delivery of education <br />and training on all aspects of risk management; serves as a resource center for risk <br />management information; and operates a grants program in risk management, environmental <br />impairment liability, and disaster management. This session will describe PERI's activities <br />and explore ways in which the traditional "hazards community" might more closely work <br />with the "risk management" community. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />4. DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING AN ACADEMIC STRUCTURE FOR <br />THE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROFESSION -II <br />Co-Moderators: Wayne Blanchard, FEMA Emergency Management Institute (PPOO-2), and <br />Ed Hecker, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers <br />Discussants: <br />Jane Kushma, University of Tennessee, Chattanooga <br />Deunis Wenger, Texas A&M University <br />Claire Rubin, George Washington University <br />Joanne McGlown, Jacksonville State University (PPOO-24) <br />JoAnne Darlington, Western Illinois University <br />Robert Parker, University of Oregon <br />Recorder: Sandra Sutphen, California State University, FulIerton <br /> <br />This is a continuation of the discussion begun during the earlier set of concurrent sessions. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.