Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />PPOO-21 <br /> <br />Susan K. Tubbesing <br />Earthquake Engineering Research Institute <br />499 14th Street, Suite 320 <br />Oakland, CA 94612 <br />(510) 4510905/(510) 451 5411fax <br />skt@eeri.org <br /> <br />Ethics on the Web <br /> <br />The Earthquake Engineering Research Institute has created a new web-based program designed <br />to illustrate ethical issues related to the practice of earthquake engineering and earthquake risk <br />reduction. This program presents case studies, updated bimonthly, in an effort to raise <br />awareness of such issues, foster discussion, and assist members of EERI and others to better <br />recognize, understand, and apply ethical principles in their work. <br /> <br />The cases presented are based on situations that could occur during the course of common <br />practice, but the names of participants and specifics of the case have been changed or removed to <br />maintain anonymity. Following the description of the situation, site visitors are encouraged <br />to evaluate several possible actions and may add additional comments. The results of these <br />responses will be presented on the site during the subsequent bimonthly cycle. <br /> <br />This project grew out of an earlier effort, funded by the EERI Endowment Fund that culminated <br />in the publication of a White Paper on Ethical Issues and Earthquake Risk Reduction. This white <br />paper, based on the premise that ethics are important but often unacknowledged in earthquake <br />risk reduction, is intended as a resource to assist professionals to recognize, understand, and <br />apply ethical principles in their work. The paper addresses major paradigms of applied ethics, <br />including individual rights, fairness or justice, utilitarianism, the common good and virtue, <br />using examples that relate these paradigms to dilemmas that arise in earthquake risk reduction. <br /> <br />A small workshop was held as part of the project and observations and discussions from that <br />workshop are summarized in the paper. Some ofthe issues discussed at the workshop included <br />the duty to disclose threats to public safety, corporate and business constraints on the scope of <br />work and quality of services; conflicts of interest; whistle-blowing; academic freedom and <br />research funding; challenges to objectivity; the relative importance between protection of the <br />public and loyalty to clients, employers and colleagues; the difficulty in defining acceptable <br />risk and the influence of uncertainty on decision making; the implications of the changing nature <br />of technology and our understanding of seismic hazards; the interaction and differences between <br />law and ethical responsibility; and issues of cultural diversity and social justice. The paper also <br />contains recommendations for future directions for the broader earthquake community. The <br />white paper is available from EERI at the above address. <br /> <br />To visit the EERI ethics web site, please go to: www.eeri.org/ethicslethics.html. EERI welcomes <br />suggestions of additional ethical dilemmas for posting on the web site. For more information or <br />to submit a dilemma, please contact ethics@eeri.org. <br />