My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03721
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03721
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:28:06 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:57:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Denver
Community
Glendale
Basin
South Platte
Title
Project Waters Phase 2 Site Comparison and Ranking Process - Glendale
Date
10/1/1996
Prepared For
Glendale
Prepared By
Dames & Moore and Chalres Anders
Floodplain - Doc Type
Flood Mitigation/Flood Warning/Watershed Restoration
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Site Comparison and Ranking Process <br /> <br />Importance <br /> <br />,..-.----.-.-~?-..-,..--.'----...,-.7""....-.-.~.-..;'-----"-"--7r-"'-"---'~7--'----'---"'7""'--'-;?-'--'.--.,.. 7'1 <br /> <br />80 r~:/r.-.-...-r-.--...--..T..---.-..-.r-----..T..--------r--...--.--r-.-.----jC-..----l..--------.-r. i <br />'"H . '~~I--r-~r-lj--i-~n <br />Iii I 'I/i <br />, 1 t------ :-----1---------, I <br />40 I'- ' - I I I <br />I. " ! ! <br />I! <br />: I! I 1/1 <br />I - -1 <br />201--, I i <br />',' I I I <br />J i <br />1[. .. ~. // <br />II 1_.______:L_n_-'_.___L__.___L______L______I._:____I_=_-~::~J._________L_____r/.'. <br />RElISE FUTlJRE IISE MINIMIZE BIOLOGICAL ACQlIIRE LAND <br />EXISTING USE . RESIDENTS CONSTRUCT CULTURAL <br /> <br />The relative ranking of the impact on residents was reduced and the opportunity for reuse was <br />increased in importance in the second preference polL Compatibility with existing and future land <br />use stiU remained a significant concern. The impact on biological and cultural resources ranked about <br />the same as the first preference poU, therefore, the CWO decided to combine them back into one site <br />selection factor, <br /> <br />The rating of the site selection factors for the recharge facility was conducted in a similar manner. <br />There were nine site selection factors for the recharge facility, six of which were the same as for the <br />reclamation facility. The three different factors were the hydrogeology of the site, ability to obtain <br />environmental permits, and opportunity to achieve all recharge at one site. <br /> <br />. Existing Land Use Compatibilily [Existing Use] - with adjacent land uses and zoning. <br /> <br />. Future Land Use Compatibility [Future Use] - with jurisdictional long range plans <br />and with special projects that may be in a planning phase. <br /> <br /> <br />DAMES & MOORE <br /> <br />Prolect WATERS Phase 2 <br />October 1996 <br /> <br />...OIoUo4ES"/oIClOIlECiROI.P~ <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />O:\OFF\123\DECIOE\WATERS1.DOC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.