Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Site Comparison and Ranking Process <br /> <br />Because the operational effectiveness rankings and the cost rankings have both been normalized to <br />100, it is possible to assess the net value, i.e., greatest operational effectiveness for the cost, by <br />simply subtracting the cost score from the operational effectiveness score for each site. Since a high <br />score for operational effectiveness and a low score for cost is most desirable, the greater the positive <br />difference, the better the relative value. <br /> <br />Reclamation Facility - Normalized Operational <br />Effectiveness vs Normalized Costs <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />". <br /> <br /> <br />~ Norm.alhed Cost <br /> <br />. Nonnalized <br />Operational Effectiveness <br /> <br />,.. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />.,,, <br /> <br />Reclamation Facility - Relative Value <br /> <br />.0 <br /> <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />.20 <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />.60 <br /> <br />..0 <br /> <br />-lOll <br /> <br /> <br />DAMES & MOORE <br /> <br />Project WATERS Phase 2 <br />October 1996 <br /> <br />ADMe.MOOAEGllOlJP~ <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />O:\OFF\123\DECIDE\WATERS1.0OC <br />