Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />Site Comparison and Ranking Process <br /> <br />The CWO indicated that they felt comfortable with the relative importance of the recharge site <br />selection factors, therefore, no second preference poll was conducted. <br /> <br />Profile of Results <br /> <br />I <br />rn <br />p <br />o <br />r <br />t <br />a <br />n <br />c <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />Importance <br /> <br />so <br /> <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />PERMITS RESIDENTS FUTURE USE MINIMIZE ACQUIRE LAND <br />HYDROGEOLOGY EXlSTING USE SINGLE SITE 81O/CULTURAL <br /> <br />DAMES & MOORE <br /> <br />Project WATERS Phase 2 <br />October 1996 <br /> <br />O:\OFF\123\DECIDE\WATERS1.0OC <br /> <br />"D.lt.MES..MOOIlEGllOUPCClftolI'AH)' <br /> <br />9 <br />