Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Proposed golf course construction will alter floodplain characteristics appreciably <br />throughout the site, but upstream of 1-25 within the City of Westminster, the 100-year <br />water surface will remain the same as for existing conditions. Because no habitable <br />structures will exist in the floodplain on the course, the 100-year flood way and 100- <br />year floodplain will have the same delineation for both FEMA and UDFCD flows. <br />Abutting property owners affected by the changes on the golf course area have agreed <br />to remove their property from the proposed floodplain. <br /> <br />Riprap was sized for areas on Big Dry Creek that will need stream stabilization, high <br />velocity protection, and storm sewer outfall protection. Typical sections were <br />established after working closely with the wetlands and landscape consultant and golf <br />course architect. <br /> <br />The total of the channel protection measures is estimated at $312,270. As a rough <br />estimate, $21,530 was used for a construction estimate for each of the four creek <br />crossings, plus $3,700 for erosion protection at each site. Therefore, the sum of capital <br />construction costs associated with Big Dry Creek is $413,190 ($516,600 with 25 percent <br />contingency for estimating construction contingency (10 percent) and engineering design <br />fees and construction services (15 percent)). The stabilization plan proposed herein is a <br />reasonable balance between capital construction costs, ongoing maintenance costs, and <br />golf course landscape aesthetics. Future maintenance will be necessary. However, the <br />effort should be modest and the stream should be stabilized and controlled to prevent <br />drastic migration into and destruction of the golf course fairways as well as unsafe <br />streambanks. <br /> <br />If stream banks are left unprotected and unstabilized, the City would be leaving itself <br />open to incurring substantial ongoing operating and maintenance expenses to deal with <br />this somewhat unpredictable situation. Experience involving the Cherry Hills Country <br />Club is a graphic example of the need to design and construct these protection measures. <br />Note, however, that this is not a guarantee as this project will compete with other <br />maintenance needs. <br /> <br />Finally, improvements to the 1-25 bridge were suggested. The UDFCD's 100-year water <br />surface upstream of 1-25 can be lowered about 5.9 feet by excavating the invert of the <br />bridge and constructing a 3.1-foot drop structure upstream. <br /> <br />1-3 <br />