My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03719
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03719
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:28:05 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:57:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Adams
Community
Thornton
Stream Name
Big Dry Creek
Basin
South Platte
Title
Floodplain Information Report
Date
4/15/1988
Prepared For
Thornton
Prepared By
McLaughlin Water Engineers, Ltd.
Contract/PO #
&&
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
222
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />features could occur. In addition, if channel banks are left unprotected, low flows <br />would cut into the banks and encroach, thus damaging fairways and tees over time. <br /> <br />Using two riprap SIZIng methods, the extent of protection in the high velocity zones <br />was determ ined. Drawing No. 8 shows the protection zones and typical sections. <br />Protection is also described at local overflow routes identified in the golf course <br />Utilities Report (McLaughlin Water Engineers, Apr. 1988). It should be noted that the <br />2-year event has similar velocity characteristics. <br /> <br />Calculations show that extensive bank protection is not needed downstream of the 10th <br />green site. Therefore, buried Type VL toe protection (d50 = 6 inches) should be used <br />along most reaches, with buried Type M used on the outside of bends. Higher velocity <br />zones, such as at the 10th green and 11th green sites, should have more extensive <br />protection as shown on Drawing No.8. <br /> <br />In general, toe protection is used to stabilize stream banks and to prevent stream <br />horizontal migration over time. The protection would be buried and would not be <br />visible, except possibly at the low flow water line. Some optional Type VL treatment is <br />shown on Drawing No.8. These zones are where stream migration may be allowed to <br />occur without causing significant damage. The proposed protection will not prevent <br />some damage during severe events, but the extent of damage will be greater if no <br />protection is used. <br /> <br />The capital cost of streambank protection is approximately $312,270, with an additional <br />$12,100 if the optional treatment zones are installed. Calculations are shown in <br />Appendix A. If streambanks are left unprotected and unstabilized, the City would be <br />leaving itself open to incurring substantial ongoing operating and maintenance expenses. <br /> <br />Four stream crossings are also shown on the attached drawings. Each of the bridges <br />were sized with a 20-foot span to minimize costs. The exact construction of the <br />bridges will be determined in final design, but could be either cast-in-place concrete, <br />pre-cast concrete boxes, pre-cast three-sided boxes or Cor- Ten steel prefabricated <br />structures. The basic hydraulic configuration for these structures is the same. <br /> <br />IIl.9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.