Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />'. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC DETERMINATIONS <br /> <br />Hydrologic Analysis <br /> <br />A hydrologic WIalysis was performed to determine the peak discharge-frequency <br />relationships for floods of the ID-, 50-, 100-, WId SOD-year reCUlTence intervals for the <br />White :River, Sulphur Creek WId Sanderson Heights at Meeker. <br />Peak flood flows on the White River were computed from a statistical analysis of <br />73 years of gaged data. A long-Pearson Type ill frequency distribution was used in the <br />WIalysis WId three sets of discharges were computed from a station skew, a regional skew, <br />WId a weighted skew coefficient. For further comparisons, a set of discharges was <br />computed from a Gumbel extreme value distribution and Hazen plotting positions for the <br />66-year period of record from 1910 to 1976. Separation of the gaged data into snowmelt <br />and rainfall events was /lOt considered. <br />Historic, or pre-record, data could not be included in the analysis because the <br />newspaper accounts contained insufficient details of the 1884 and 1897 flood events. <br />Several forms of regional comparisons were made as an aid in evaluating and <br />interpreting the statistical flood frequency analyses. These included flood discharges <br />calculated from regional multiple regression equations (TM-l, reference 13), the index <br />flood method (WSP 1683, reference 14), and comparisons with runoff (CSM) ratios for <br />adopted 100-year frequency flood discharges in Northwest Colorado. The discharge <br />frequency curve for the White River is shown in Figure 7. <br />On Sulphur Creek and Sanderson Heights, no stream gaging records were available. <br />Because of the size and altitude of the basins, it was assumed that floods flows would be <br />caused primarily by rainfall from thunderstorms. For both Sulphur Creek and Sanderson <br />Heights, synthetic flood hydrographs were developed according to the U.S.D.A. Soil <br />Conservation Service procedure for determining peak flows in Colorado (Reference 4). <br /> <br />- 10- <br /> <br />This procedure requires the use of 24-hour rainfall values which were obtained from the <br />National Weather Service (Reference 5). <br />The 10-, 50-, WId 100-year peaks flows determined by the S.C.S. method for Sulphur <br />Creek and Sanderson Heights Drainageway were plotted on probability paper, See Figure <br />7. To determine the SOD-year flood, the Probable Maximum Flood and the flood using <br />"Assumption B" (Reference 3) were also plotted to establish the upper limit and to check <br />the reasonableness of the magnitude of the 100-year flood. On Sulphur Creek, the 10- <br />year, 50-year and 100-year floods were computed using 24-hour rainfall values for the <br />May-October season to establish the trend for the lower frequency floods. <br />After careful consideration of the results of the hydrologic analyses, the following <br />peak flow discharges were adopted for use in this study. <br />PEAK FLOOD DISCHARGE IN CUBIC FEET PER SECOND <br /> <br />Study Reach Exceedance Interval in Years <br />10 50 100 500 <br />White River 4600 5900 6500 7700 <br />(D.A. = 872 sq.mi.) <br />Sulphur Creek 820 1510 1850 3300 <br />(D.A. = 27.2 sq.mi.) <br />SWIderson Heights 46 107 145 300 <br />(D.A. = 0.45 sq.mi.) <br /> <br />Detailed descriptions, data and computations of the hydrologic techniques used for <br />the White River, Sulphur Creek and Sanderson Heights Drainageway are in the Technical <br />Addendum to this report. <br />