My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03681
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03681
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:27:59 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:56:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
110
County
Routt
Community
Hayden
Basin
Yampa/White
Title
FIS - Hayden
Date
12/1/1977
Designation Date
7/1/1978
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2.3 Principal Flood Problems <br /> <br />Low-lying areas in the western part of Hayden are subject to periodic <br />flooding caused by overflow of Dry Creek. Flooding that is caused <br />by ponding of runoff and overflow from two irrigation ditches that <br />intercept runoff from a small watershed southeast of the town occurs <br />in low-lying areas in the easter~ and central parts of the town, <br />The flooding generally occurs in early spring as a result of snow- <br />melt or a combination of snowmelt and rain. <br /> <br />According to a report published by the u.s. Army Corps of Engineers <br />in February 1976, the worst known flooding in the Steamboat Springs <br />area occurred in June 1921 and April 1974 (Reference 2), The 1921 <br />flood, wr.ich was caused by a combination of rapid snowmelt and heavy <br />rains, occurred principally on the Yampa River and on Soda Creek. <br />Exact dates and flow rates are unknown, other than those recorded at <br />the Yampa River gaging station. Information regarding flows and <br />date of maximum floodflow is not available. <br /> <br />The effect of historjcaJ floodflows from the Yarnpa River has been <br />essentially negligible due to the protection provided by t~e rail- <br />road earth embankment that parallels the town's northern corporate <br />limits. <br /> <br />2.4 Flood Protection Measures <br /> <br />The northern corporate limits o~ Hayden, which borders the southern <br />limits of the Yampa River flood plain, is protected by ar. earth <br />embankment of t~e Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad. <br /> <br />Immediately upstream from the railroad crossing on Dry Creek, a <br />levee has been constructed on the left bank looking downstream. <br />Another levee, also on Dry Creek, is located on' the right bank, just <br />upstream from the county road crossing west of the county fairgrounds. <br />Erosion of these levees through the years has caused considerable <br />deterioration, and overtopping by high water could result. <br /> <br />Several small reservoirs or stock ponds, including J.e. Temple <br />Reservoir, are located in the Dry Creek Basin, south of the corporate <br />limits. Although these structures were not designed for flood <br />protection, they may retain or retard a portion of the runoff, thus <br />reducing peak flows at H~ydcn. <br /> <br />The Town of Hayden imposes a city restriction on land subdivison in <br />that 5 percent must bo left undeveloped as greenbelt areas. The <br />totoJn also requires drainage easements. <br /> <br />3.0 ENGINEERING METHODS <br /> <br />For flooding sour~es studied in detail in tho community, standard hydro- <br />logic and hydraulic study methods were used to determine the flood <br />hazard data required for t~is study. Floods having recurrence intervals <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.