Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />,I <br />I <br />II <br />'I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />11 <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />DISCUSSION of RESULTS <br /> <br />The comparison of the dischorges determined in this study and <br />those determined in the Flood Insurance Study are shown in <br />Table VI I. <br /> <br />Table VII. Discharge Comparison <br /> <br /> QIO (ds) Q50 (ds) QIOO (ds) <br /> Present FIA Present FIA Present FIA <br />Location Study Study Study Study Study Study <br />U. S. Highway 660 1190 1950 2230 2820 2650 <br />287 <br />Confluence 660 1610 1900 2930 2700 3480 <br />with Cache <br />la Poudre <br />River <br /> <br />A first observation from this discharge comparison is that the <br /> <br />discharge throughout the study reach is constant or decreases <br /> <br />slightly downstream using the SWIvlMmodel. This result would be <br /> <br />expected where a large basin narrows into a small bottleneck at <br /> <br />:' ~': ~~, ,,~, <br />_~~;..i"f,t~'4") <br />