Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(1) How did the state -- its agencies and its citizens -- per- <br />form during the June floods? <br /> <br />(2) What can the General Assembly do to improve the state's <br />performance during flood disastel:s through the adoption of changes in <br />cldministrative procedures and thl:ough statutory or consti tuti,)nal <br />Ell1actments? <br /> <br />(3) What can the state do to lessen the impact of future dis- <br />Clsters? <br /> <br />The following sections contain summaries of the major areas rl~viewed <br />by the committee during the COUrlje of its meetings in attempting to <br />arrive at answers to the questions resulting from the flood disasters. <br /> <br />pisaster Operations <br /> <br />All reports indicated tha1t the disaster operations wer'~ conduc- <br />ted in commendable fashion by the state agencies concerned. The <br />governor, the heads of state departments, and local officials com- <br />mented favorably on the cooperation and assistance which they experi- <br />Ell1ced during the time of emergency. Major problems were reported, <br />however, with respect to communications and transportation. A need <br />for more planning for disaster operations was also brought out during <br />the committee's meetings. <br /> <br />The area of communications represented the number one problem <br />in the conduct of disaster operations at all governmental levels. <br />Included in this area were reports of inaccurate or non-existent re- <br />porting on water levels or flood crests; difficultiE!S in communicating <br />between state and local officials carrying out disaster operations, as <br />well as difficulties in knowing what others were doing within the same <br />organizational level; and the inability in some cases of being able to <br />sort fact from fiction from the various reports being received. <br /> <br />To illustrate, an air lift operation was conducted to evacuate <br />people supposedly stranded only to discover subsequently that an un- <br />damaged road led into this area, and considerable time was also spent <br />in tracking down rumors which in most instances proved to be unfounded. <br />Once the flood hit, the mayor of Lamar reported, the local radio <br />stations were disabled and he had no way to contact thE! people in the <br />community. At one time the National Guard received a request far 325 <br />men from the mayor of Englewood and about ten minutes later a separate <br />request was received from the shllriff of Arapahoe County for 300 men; <br />i.t was later discovered that these were the same requests. <br /> <br />Closely related to the problem of connunicatians was the problem <br />of transportation. State highways, county roads, and city streets <br />were dealt a severe blow by the floods, and immedi~t~ restoration of <br />major surface traffic routes and connecting links was the pr~nary con- <br />cern of both state and local highway departments. The first p::oblem <br />encountered involved traffic control and evacuation of stranded persons. <br />Jlnather problem accompanying the floods was posed by sightseers, both <br />before and after the floods arrived. In this connection, despite the <br />fact that the powers of the State Patrol are essentially confined to <br />highways, necessity dictated that state patrolmen order many curious <br /> <br />.. 21 - <br />