Laserfiche WebLink
<br />A survey conducted by the Savings and Loan League of Colorado <br />in regard to mortgaged homes destroyed or damaged by the floods re- <br />vealed that 13 of the 34 associations in the Denver metropolitan area <br />held mortgages on damaged or destroyed homes. The final loss to the <br />associations will probably approach $5,000,000 since mortgages on these <br />homes will be or have been cancelled, or an association takes over the <br />property and cancels the remaining indebtedness. <br /> <br />In this connection, in cases of total loss, the associations <br />reduced the mortgage or indebtedness to the value of the land. For <br />example, a $10,000 mortgage which covered an $8,000 home and a $2,000 <br />plot of land would be reduced to $2,000; the monthly payment would be <br />reduced where the owner wished to retain the plot, and the associations <br />would take title to a plot and cancel the indebtedness where the owner <br />did not wish to retain the land. In cases of partial loss, mortgage <br />payments were deferred from 90 days to six months. Occasionally, where <br />the Small Business Administration was involved with repair loans, the <br />associations reduced the amount of the mortgage by the amount of the <br />S.B.A. loan or rehabilitation cost. <br /> <br />Insurance Commissioner <br /> <br />In regard to actions of the insurance industry after the flood <br />waters receded, the Insurance Commissioner reported that, almost with- <br />out exception, life insurance companies deferred premium payments due <br />from persons whose property had been damaged or destroyed by the floods. <br />These companies also arranged immediate loans of cash values without <br />the usual home office delays caused by red tape, and most of the mort- <br />gage agencies declared a moratorium on home mortgage payments. In <br />addition, casualty insurance companies brought in their top adjusters <br />to assist homeowners insured against damages from hail, fire, etc., and <br />many adjusters provided assessment of damages to noninsured homeowners. <br /> <br />As far as flood insurance coverage is concerned, almost 100 per <br />cent of the residences damaged were not covered. However, almost all <br />passenger vehicles were covered with the comprehensive portion of <br />automobile insurance. Similarly, many commercial vehicles were covered <br />by insurance and, for the most part, house trailers were covered by the <br />extension of the automobile comprehensive coverage. Some other house <br />trailers were covered by blanket mortgage insurance. Generally, com- <br />mercial buildings were not covered by insurance except for those build- <br />ings owned by national firms, such as May D&F, that had insurance <br />covering the contents of their many buildings across the country. <br /> <br />The Insurance Commissioner believes that there may be flood in- <br />surance in the future for property owners who cannot now purchase <br />protection against this risk. The National Association of Insurance <br />Commissioners has appointed a hurricane and flood committee to consider <br />the feasibility of optional or mandatory flood insurance coverage. <br />Federal legislation would be necessary in order to allow the insurance <br />industry to establish flood insurance protection, either to provide a <br />temporary subsidy to an insurance pool until it contains a given amount, <br />similar to subsidies provided F.D.I.C. and F.H.A. pools, or to prevent <br />the pool's participating companies from being subjected to antitrust <br />suits, or both. <br /> <br />- 10 - <br />