Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Title (all caps) HYDRAULICS OF STEEP-GRADIENT STREAMS <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />Centra I Reg ion <br />Number of /' S- <br />pages ~ <br />Number of <br />i llustl"ations <br />Number of <br />tab I es <br />Number of <br />references <br /> <br />Classification <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />, <br /> <br />I <br />i <br /> <br />7. <br />8. <br /> <br />// <br />35 <br /> <br />Authors <br /> <br />Robert D. Jarrett <br /> <br />Descriptors Channels, <br /> <br />regime, Natural <br />Velocity head <br /> <br />Critical flow, Flow, Flow resistance, <br />streams, Open-channel flow, Roughness <br /> <br />Hydraulics, HydrolOQical , <br />coefficient, Velocity distribution, I <br />, <br />, <br />, <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I dent i f iers <br /> <br />Colorado, Steep-gradient streams <br /> <br />Type or publ icaticn <br /> <br />Journal article - Journal of Hydraulics Division, ASCE <br /> <br />Al::stl"ac:: <br /> <br />Existing guidelines for the evaluation of the channel roughness <br />, <br />. 00 <br />of steep-gradient streams (slope greater than 0.2 ~ere~l,t) have been <br />A <br /> <br />based on insufficient data. Many of these steep-gradient streams also <br /> <br />require additional hydraulic analysis. Onsite surveys and 75 measurements <br /> <br /> <br />of discharge were made on 21 steep-gradient streams for the purpose of <br /> <br />computing the Manning roughness coefficient, n, and to provide data on <br /> <br />the hydraulics of these streams. These data show that: (1) n varies <br /> <br />inversely with depth, (2) n varies directly with slope, (3) the vertical- <br />/ <br />velocity distribution does not fit a logarithmic curve, and (4) streams <br /> <br />thought to be in the supercritical flow range were actually in the <br /> <br />subcritical range. <br /> <br />A simple and objective method was employed to develop an equation <br /> <br />for predicting the n of steep-gradient streams by ~sing multiple-regression <br /> <br />techniques and measurements of the slope and hydraulic radius. The <br /> <br />average standard error of estimate of the prediction equation was 28 percent <br /> <br />when tested with Colorado data. The equation was veriJied using other <br /> <br />data available for steep-gradient streams. Regime-flOW equations for <br /> <br />velocity and discharge also were developed. <br /> <br />- <br />