Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ik <br />"\'>' <br /> <br />20' <br /> <br />NOVEMBER 1973 <br /> <br />A <br />~' <br /> <br />v (l = average raindrop velocity; <br />x, y, z ~ coordinates (Fig. I); <br />y c = critical depth at outlet; <br />al' CXl' cx) = eigenvalues of A; <br />~ I' ~2'~' ~ eigenvalucs of B; <br />9 x' 9 y' 9 z = angles of inclination that gravitational force makes wid! <br />x., Yw, and z-axes, respectively; . <br />e = watershed slope angle in direction of main channel (FiJ.- <br />I); <br />v = kinematic viscosity of fluid; <br />p = mass density of fluid;' <br />{J = maximum eigenvalue of either A or B; <br />T.1' T Z = boundary shears in x- and z-directions, respectively; <br />4> = watershed slope angle in direction perpendicular to maia -: <br />channel (Fig. I); and <br />* = superscript for normalized quantities. <br /> <br />,< <br /> <br />~. <br />" <br />~, <br />f4 <br />~ <br />I <br />~ <br />" <br />~ <br />f! <br />~ <br />" <br />" <br />t: <br />~ <br />i: <br />!. <br />h <br />~ <br />, <br /> <br />I <br />i <br />1 t ~-. <br />I "i <br />I' <br /> <br /> <br />). <br /> <br />~1 <br />JOURNAL OF THE <br />HYDRAULICS DIVISION <br /> <br />NOVEMBER 1973 <br /> <br />,!i ~ <br /> <br />SEDIMENT TRANSPORT: NEW ApPROACH <br />AND ANALYSIS <br /> <br />By Peter Ackers 1 and William Rodney Wbite2 <br /> <br />IHmooUCTION <br /> <br />The transport of noncohesive sediments by a steady uniform flow of fluid <br />in an open channel is a complex process, and the physics of this two-phase <br />motion is as yet incompletely understood. Many theories have been put forward <br />in attempts to provide frameworks for the analysis of data on sediment transport, <br />., some being based on the physics of particle motion and others on similarity <br />1>' principles or dimensional arguments. Very different answers may result from <br />, Ibe use of available predictive equations and some are complicated to apply. <br />There has been an academic preference for shear stress as the main parameter <br />defining the stream's transporting power. However, the total shear on a deformed <br />,,~ bed (rippled or duned) is in part composed of the along-stream components <br />of the normal pressures on the irregular bed profile. Although these normal <br />pressures may contribute indirectly to sediment motion through suspension, <br />many methods separate the bed shear into the non transporting form loss and <br />the shear on the grains. As the rate of transport is very sensitive to transporting <br />power, inaccuracy in this separation procedure may give large errors of prediction. <br />:., In engineering practice, this factor is important because few natural streams <br />have a plane bed. Several researchers have suggested that shear stress is not <br />the most convenient, nor the most rational, basis of a sediment transport function, <br />and have proposed methods of correlation that use average stream velocity <br />in preference to shear stress. <br /> <br />Note.-Discussion open until April 1, 1974. To extend the closing date one month, <br />a written request must be filed with the Editor of Technical Publications, ASCE. This <br />paper is part of the copyrighted Journal of the Hydraulics Division, Proceedings of the <br />American SociNy of Civil Engineers, Vol. 99, No. HYll. November, 1973. Manuscript <br />was submitted for review for possible publication on April 4, 1973. <br />IConsultant, Binnie and Partners, London, England; previously Asst. Dir., Hydr. <br />Research Sta., Wallingford, England. <br />2Principal Sci. Officer, Hydr. Research Station, Wallingford, England. <br /> <br />2041 <br /> <br /> <br />l <br />II, <br />} <br />! <br />I <br />! <br />,. <br /> <br />I <br />J <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />, <br />.' <br /> <br />.;; <br />I <br />j <br />'!', <br />',I. <br />h" <br />if <br />