My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03601
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03601
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:27:45 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:54:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Stream Name
All
Basin
Statewide
Title
Evaluation of and Recommendations for Drop Structures in the Denver Metropolitan Area
Date
12/1/1986
Prepared For
UDFCD
Prepared By
McLaughlin Water Engineers, Ltd.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />-I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />TABLE 1-2 <br />MINIMUM DESIGN THICKNESS CRITERIA <br />GROUTED SLOPING BOULDER DROPS <br /> <br />Design <br />Parameter <br /> <br />Drop Height <br />3 foot or less <br /> <br />Drop Height <br />Greater than 3 feet <br /> <br />Uniform Rock Size - <br />Minimum Dimension <br /> <br />1.5 foot <br /> <br />2,0 foot. <br /> <br />Minimum Grout - Thickness <br /> <br />1.0 foot <br /> <br />1.5 foot. <br /> <br />. May use 1.5 rock and LO foot grout for flow depths upstream of crest (normal depth) less than 3 foot. <br /> <br />VERTICAL RIPRAP DROPS - SECTION XII <br />The design method presented in the 1986 MWE report is based on original research by Smith and <br />Strang, 1967, later extrapolated by Stevens, 1981. Although this work is still applicable, it has been <br />climated from the revised USDCM Hydraulic Structures section in favor of a simplified guideline, <br /> <br />Since 1986, UDFCD has reduced the maximum allowable vertical drop height to 3 feet for safety <br />reasons, To address submergence problems, MWE reviewed several references (Linden, 1963; <br />Urbonas, 1968; the COE, 1970; Corry, 1975; Little, 1981 and 1982; and SLA, 1986, The simplified <br />guidelines as presented in the revised structures section of the USDCM, are based on the original <br />work by Smith and Strange amended to consider submergence and function within the UDFCD <br />maximum channel flow parameters, <br /> <br />BAFFLE CHUTE DROPS - SECTION XII <br />Refinements are now available regarding back water effects produced by the first row of baffle blocks <br />which protrude into the upstream flow area in the standard USBR design, The Fujimoto entrance, <br />also developed by the USBR, is a modification that can be used to reduce such effects, This and other <br />information is presented in the revised Hydraulic Structures section of the USDCM, <br /> <br />NOTES REGARDING THE REVISED HYDRAULIC STRUCTURES DESIGN CRITERIA <br />The theoretical background information presented in the 1986 MWE report has served as a basis for <br />developing the more simplified design criteria currently included in the 1990 revised Hydraulic <br />Structures section of the USDCM, Graphical relationships, are now provided which give the basic <br />drop crest configuration and channel parameters as a function of discharge which will result in <br />performance at allowable maximum flow conditions, The crest transition configuration is essential <br />to control the approach velocity acceleration while simultaneously preventing backwater depth from <br />becoming excessive, <br /> <br />1-7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.