Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />3.3 CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />After careful review of the results of this report and <br />those presented in previous studies, it is recommended <br />this final flood hydrology should be used for the <br />evaluation of present flooding potential. Some of the <br />factors supporting this recommendation follow: <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />Since the performance of previous studies, there <br />have been major changes in UD&FCD hydrologic <br />guidelines and study procedures. <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />The criteria used to calculate infiltration rates <br />has changed considerably. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />The previous studies did not utilize routing pro- <br />cedures and average bas in areas exceeded UD&FCD <br />guidelines. <br /> <br />The flows determined by the previous studies are <br />based on fully developed conditions. <br /> <br />If any agency or individual wishes to use the data developed for <br />this preliminary report, it would be beneficial if the individual <br />or agency contacted the Federal Emergency tlanagement Agency, <br />Federal Center, Lakewood, Colorado, 80225, to discuss the data <br />limitations. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br />