My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03496
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03496
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:27:28 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:48:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Sensitivity of WSR-88D Rainfall Estimates to the Rain Rate Threshold and Rain Gauge Adjustment: A Flash Flood Case Study
Date
6/8/1998
Prepared By
NOAA
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />the basin where the town of Buffalo Creek is located which, coincidentally, is also the portion of <br /> <br /> <br />the basin that had been ravaged by a forest fire two months earlier (Table 4 and Fig. I). The lack <br /> <br /> <br />of vegetation in the burn area was suggested to be an important reason for the severity of the <br /> <br /> <br />flash flood (see the Appendix). <br />The one-hour Flash Flood Guidance (FFG) rainfall valid for Jefferson County as issued <br /> <br />by the NWS Missouri Basin River Forecast Center earlier in the day was 53.3 mm (2.1 inches; <br /> <br />see dashed line in Fig. 14c). FFG rainfall represents the approximate amount of basin-averaged <br /> <br />rainfall over a given duration that is needed to bring small streams to bankfull (Sweeney 1992), <br /> <br />It is estimated daily for rainfall durations of 1,3, and 6 hours by the operational hydrologic <br /> <br />forecast models at the RFCs. NWS forecasters often compare the model-estimated FFG rainfall <br /> <br />with observed gauge- or radar-derived rainfall in real time to access flash flood risk. Since this <br /> <br />rainfall event was of approximately one-hour duration, the one-hour FFG is the appropriate one <br /> <br />to examine here. <br /> <br />The basin-maximum one-hour rainfall exceeded the one-hour FFG from 0257 to 0332 <br /> <br />UTC, however the basin-averaged rainfall at its peak at 0303 UTC was about three times smaller <br /> <br />than the one-hour FFG. As a result, a comparison ofFFG with basin-maximum radar rainfall <br /> <br />instead of basin-averaged rainfall would have been more appropriate in alerting forecasters to the <br /> <br />potential flood threat for this case. The basin-maximum one-hour rainfall fust exceeded the FFG <br /> <br />value beginning at 0257 UTC which corresponds closely to the time when the public reported <br /> <br />that the Buffalo Creek came out of its banks. The intensity and small size of this rainfall event <br /> <br />likely made the model-estimated FFG rainfall inappropriate for this event even if you don't <br /> <br />consider the unmodelled effect of the forest fire on the infiltration characteristics and resulting <br />23 <br /> <br />v <br /> <br />,/ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.