My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03481
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03481
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:27:25 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:48:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Arkansas
Title
Post Flood Assessment Report Arkansas River Southern Colorado
Date
9/15/1999
Prepared For
Southern Colorado
Prepared By
US Army Corps of Engineers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
189
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />deer across the main tourist area of Manitou Springs presents a real threat to life and property. <br />As pointed out in the reconnaissance report, even the best flood warning system may not be <br />effective when a high percentage of the population may be tourists who are unfamiliar with the <br />emergency procedures. On the other hand, a higher capacity channel would result in faster travel <br />of the peak flow to downstream areas that already experience problems with flooding. <br /> <br />Arkansas River <br /> <br />Increased base flow in the Arkansas River induced by the discharge of trans-mountain water into <br />Fountain Creek creates a similar imbalance in the river system. The natural processes of <br />meandering, increased bank erosion and channel bed degradation in some reaches and increased <br />aggradation of the channel bed in other Teaches negatively affects communities and properties <br />along the river. Such effects have been evident for Rocky Ford, La Junta and Las Animas. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Discharges of water stored at Pueblo Dam might also be considered an artificially induced <br />increase to the base flow within the Arkansas River as well. When such releases are made in <br />anticipation of flood control storage requirements, there is the possibility that downstream flood <br />conditions could be worsened. Over the past year the dam has been operated under a deviation <br />from the standard procedures to accommodate construction of a stabilizing berm on the <br />downstream toe. Irrigation storage levels have been maintained at lower than usual levels. The <br />Bureau of Reclamation has requested a change to the deviation allowing greater irrigation <br />storage. The stabilizing berm is near complete and therefore the dam safety concerns which lead <br />to reduced storage levels are not as compelling. <br /> <br />Although Trinidad Reservoir provides protection in the upper reaches of the Purgatoire River, the <br />flood peak at Las Animas is hardly affected for the larger events. Nevertheless, for more <br />frequent events, the storage of flood volumes in the upper reaches provides some benefit to <br />downstream communities. <br /> <br />ASSISTANCE PROVIDED BY THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS <br /> <br />The following flood assistance authorities and programs were used during and after the April 29, <br />1999 flood: <br /> <br />Public Law 84-99; This law authorizes the Corps of Engineers to provide emergency operations, <br />investigation and rehabilitation of damaged Federal and non-Federal flood control projects, and <br />after action reporting. The Corps executes these responsibilities under the Flood Control and <br />Coastal Emergencies Program financed under appropriation 96X3125. At the start of the flood <br />event the district had $35,000 under category 200, Emergency Operation~, Class 210, Response <br />Operations. This amount was increased by an additional $35,000 on May 6, 1999 for a total of <br />$70,000. On May II, 1999, the Albuquerque District requested Category 300, Rehabilitation <br />and Inspection Program funds, Class 340, Field Investigation for Proposed Rehabilitation <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Post Flood Assessment Report <br /> <br />29 <br /> <br />Chapter 3 - Flood of April29, 1999 <br />Draft Revised 09/09/99 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.