Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Some minor problems arose while collecting bed-material-size data. Large <br />boulders and embedded particles had to be measured in place. Only two of the <br />three particle diameters could be measured when the particle was embedded in <br />the stream bottom. An interesting problem existed at the Cache La Poudre <br />River at Fort Collins. Here, large strips of fine sandy material were <br />bordered by bedrock and large particles. The Wolman method was used as <br />described at the beginning of this section. When the large strips of fines <br />were observed, bulk samples were collected. These bulk samples were combined, <br />and 8 single, composite sieve analysis was made. The sieve and Wolman pebble- <br />count data were then combined into a single overall size-frequency <br />distribution. This was accomplished by: (1) Computing separate frequency <br />distributions for the sieve data and the pebble-count data; and (2) combining <br />the two distributions into one by weighting each size class percentage by the <br />proportion of bed surface area occupied by the large stones or the fine sand. <br />The method is described in detail by Williams and Guy (1973, p. 44-45) and by <br />Benson and Dalrymple (1967, p. 19-20). At the Cache La Poudre River station <br />11 percent of the surface area was bedrock. The vertical height of the <br />smooth, rounded bedrock was measured, a~d the particle size-frequency distri- <br />bution was completed using the bedrock vertical height as an intermediate <br />diameter (Benson and Dalrymple, 1967, p. 20). If the bedrock vertical height <br />was assumed equal to zero, very little change occurred in the high and low <br />ends of the size-frequency distribution. Therefore, the bedrock measurements <br />were excluded when constructing particle size-frequency distributions for the <br />short and long diameters. This produced consistent results between frequency <br />distributions for the short, intermediate, and long diameters as shown in <br />tables 2, 3, and 4. The method of dealing with the bedrock measurements, <br />therefore, is considered satisfactory. <br /> <br /> Table 2.--Summarg of short diameter (c-axis) bed material <br /> Statistical size distribution, in feet, Particles Particles <br /> Site shown for the following percentiles vertically horizontally <br /> number oriented oriented <br /> 16 25 50 75 84~ . -'1J1 q~ ..~ppr~ent ) (percent) <br /> -------- ~-- <br /> 1 0.05 0.12 0.26 0.34 0.45 0.70 93 3 <br /> 2 0.04 .06 .17 .35 .47 .60 .78 93 5 <br /> 3 .06 .08 .15 .26 .33 .40 .51 91 7 <br /> 41 .001 .002 .12 .37 .50 .57 .62 93 2 <br /> 52 <br />1 6 .08 .10 .16 .22 .26 .32 .43 92 5 <br />I 7 .17 .22 .38 .61 .77 .96 1.25 91 4 <br />8 .04 .05 .10 .20 .28 .37 .52 93 2 <br />I 9 .11 .15 .27 .43 .54 .67 .83 80 6 <br />10 .08 .10 .16 .26 .33 .39 .49 94 0 <br />I 11 .10 .13 .23 .35 .43 .54 .68 89 6 <br /> 1Combined Wolman method and sieve analysis (Wolman, 1954) . <br />\ 2Sieve analysis only. <br /> <br />11 <br />