My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03466
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03466
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:27:23 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:47:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Stream Channel Erosion Protection at Roadway Crossings
Date
8/1/1987
Prepared By
USGS
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Each of the bridge, geomorphic, and flow factors is related to the bridge <br /> <br />design process in several ways, and changes in one factor may subsequently <br /> <br />affect others. There are instances where it is desirable to modify the <br /> <br />channel, flood plain, amount of flow, or flow alignment at a bridge site. <br /> <br />Knowledge of existing geomor~hic and flow factors can be used as guidelines to <br /> <br />estimate the effects of a prcposed site modification. <br /> <br />The determination of the design flood at a bridge is usually based on historic <br /> <br />or observed flow data. Sometimes these data are available at the site, but <br /> <br />most often they are estimated from rainfall records, or transferred by <br /> <br />statistical methods from a streamflow gaging station nearby. The water level <br /> <br />(stage) associated with the design flood is estimated from historical data or <br /> <br />computed from channel conditions as measured at the bridge site. Estimates of <br /> <br />these flow factors are then ~.sed in the design of the bridge or <br /> <br />countermeasure. A lack of we.ter level or discharge data at a bridge may give <br /> <br />misleading design criteria if unexpected or temporary flow conditions, such as <br /> <br />backwater occurs. Also, flo~' factors determined at a bridge site are affected <br /> <br />by geomorphic changes. For Example, several geomorphic and flow factors will <br /> <br />change if a meander cutoff occurs in the vicinity of a bridge site. The <br /> <br />occurrence of man-induced or natural channel changes presents a problem to the <br /> <br />bridge designer because hydn.ulic conditions used in the design of the bridge <br /> <br />may change with time. <br /> <br />At sites protected with rock riprap, there is evidence that the success or <br /> <br />failure of bank protection measures are related not only to proper selection <br /> <br />of the flow stress/stone SiZE~ (DSO) in the design procedure, but also to the <br /> <br />evaluation of the hydraulic Hnd channel factors that are typical or <br /> <br />potentially applicable to th" site. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.