Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page 40 <br /> <br />B. RUNOFF <br /> <br />1. Developed Flow Rates and Paths <br /> <br />C. DETENTION <br /> <br />1. Volumes Required and Provided <br />2. Release Rates and Method of Release <br />3. Excess Storm Water Passage <br /> <br />D. STREETS <br /> <br />*1. Depth and Velocity of Flow for Initial and Major Storms <br />2. Storm Drainage System <br /> <br />"'E. OPEN CHANNEL FLOW <br /> <br />1. Type Channel (lining) <br />2. Maximum Depth and Velocity <br /> <br />F. STORM SEWERS and CULVERTS <br /> <br />V. CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />A. DISCUSS IMPACT OF IMPROVEMENT <br /> <br />1. Benefits - Does improvement reduce existing drainage problems? <br />2. Adverse impacts with solutions to mitigate impact <br /> <br />B. STATE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CRITERIA <br /> <br />1. Detention Ponds <br />*2. Depth and Velocity of Street Flow <br />*3. Channel Flow Depth and Velocity <br /> <br />C. AREAS IN FLOOD HAZARD ZONE MEET ARTICLE 14 OF THE LAKEWOOD ZONIN:, <br />ORDINANCE. (Special Use Permit may be Required). <br /> <br />VI. APPENDIXES <br /> <br />A. HYDROLOGIC & HYDRAULIC COMPUTATIONS <br /> <br />1. Runoff (HlStoric) <br />a. Historlc off-sitt"' + site- for as many design pOUlts .1:'> <br />required <br />I. Sepdrate time of concentration (Tc) for each design <br />point (RatIonal Method) <br />2. Runoff coeff. or permeability coeff. from Table III <br />3. ExistIng drainage faCIlities carrying flows - must <br />include flow for en~ir~ tributary area for each <br />design point <br />4. Irrigation ditch flows <br />