Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page 40 <br /> <br />B, RUNOFF <br /> <br />1. Developed Flow Rates and Paths <br /> <br />C, DETENTION <br /> <br />1, Volumes Required and Provided <br />2. Release Rates and Method of Release <br />3, Excess Storm Water Passage <br /> <br />D, STREETS <br /> <br />1. Depth and Velocity of Flow for Initial and Major Storms <br />2, Storm Drainage System <br /> <br />E , OPEN CHANNEL FLOW <br /> <br />1. Type Channel (lining) <br />2, Maximum Depth and Velocity <br /> <br />F, STORM SEWERS and CULVERTS <br /> <br />V. CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />A. DISCUSS IMPACT OF IMPROVEMENT <br /> <br />1. Benefits - Does improvement reduce existing drainage problems? <br />2, Adverse with solutions to mitigate impact <br /> <br />B, STATE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CRITERIA <br /> <br />1, Detention Ponds <br />2. Depth and Velocity of Street Flow <br />3, Channel Flow Depth and Velocity <br /> <br />C, AREAS IN FLOOD HAZARD ZONE MEET ARTICLE 14 OF THE LAKE WOOD ZONING <br />ORDINANCE, (Special Use Permit may be Required), <br /> <br />VI. APPENDIXES <br /> <br />A, HYDROLOGIC & HYDRAULIC COMPUTATIONS <br /> <br />1, Runoff (Historic) <br />a. Historic off-site + site for as many design points as <br />required <br />1, Separate time of concentration (Tc) for each design <br />point (Rational Method) <br />2, Runoff coeff, or permeability coeff, from Table III <br />3, Existing drainage facilities carrying flows - must <br />include flow for entire tributary area for each <br />design point <br />4. Irrigation ditch flows <br />