My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03449
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03449
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:27:19 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:46:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Stream Name
All
Basin
Statewide
Title
Colorado Flood Proofing Manual
Date
10/1/1983
Prepared For
State of Colorado
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
148
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />55 <br /> <br />-~ <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />w <br /> <br />( a ) <br /> <br />( b ) <br /> <br />Figure 6,10, Characteristics of a roti\tional slide. (Reference 6) <br /> <br />~ <br />;:::.. I I <br />.... I / <br />.............. <br />.............. I I ACTIVE <br />=r...... DIRECTION OR 1*-+/ -PRESSURE <br />SLIDE I <br />..... ......... ~ 111( -. I / <br />'L ~...v <br /> <br />PASSIVE <br />PRESSURE <br /> <br />Figure '0,11, Translatory slide, (Reference 8) <br /> <br />Figure 6.10 illustrates a cross section of a sliding soil mass along a curved surface (rotational <br />failure surface). The sliding tendency is developed b~ the moment of the mass about the <br />center of the arc as shown. This moment is opposed by the total shearing resistance <br />developed along the assumed sliding surface. Of course, when all available resistance is over- <br />come, a progressive failure occurs. <br /> <br />Various numerical procedures, most involving possi~le curved failure surfaces have been <br />proposed for evaluating the rotational slide, but a hi~h degree of accuracy in defining a <br />failure shape is inconsistent with other inherent feat\"es of the analysis (i.e., uniformity of <br />soil, number of boring samples tested, possible judg\nent in computation of angle of friction <br />or cohesion, the weight of soil, etc.) , For this reason,' the simple Swedish Slide Method or the <br />Modified Swedish Method (method of slices) among others, are acceptable analysis techni- <br />ques, Most geotechnical engineering firms have acc~ss to computer programs that call quic- <br />kly evaluate embankment stability if a detailed anal~sis is required, <br /> <br />For more detailed information relating to slope stab:ility analysis and other embankment <br />design considerations, the reader is encouraged to r<lfer to Design and Construction of <br />Levees. EM 1110-2-1913 as published by the US A~my Corps of Engineers (Reference 40). <br />However, for preliminary design and cost estimating purposes, a slope stability analysis is not <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.