Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EM 1110.2.2504 <br />31 Mar 94 <br /> <br />I. x _ I. c .1. <br /> <br />b <br /> <br />-I <br /> <br />N <br /> <br /> <br />o =..9.. {- !.a+ c+b-x II <br />H II C b <br />2z R2 2z R2} <br />+-In-+-In- <br />c R1 b ~ <br /> <br />Figure 4-8. Triangular load <br /> <br />e. Triangular loads. A lriangular load varies per- <br />pendicular 10 Ihe wall as shown in Figure 4-8 and is <br />assumed 10 be continuous parallel 10 Ihe wall. The <br />equation for IaleraI pressure is given in Figure 4-8. <br /> <br />f Area loads. A SlD'Charge dislribuled over a Iim- <br />iled area. both parallel and petpendicular 10 Ihe wall, <br />should be treated as an area load. The IaleraI pressures <br />induced by area loads may be calculated using New- <br />mark's Influence CharIs (Newmarli: 1942). The IaleraI <br />pressures due 10 area loads vIII)' wilh deplh below Ihe <br />ground surface and wilh horizonlal distance parallel 10 <br />Ihe wall. Because the design procedures discussed <br />subsequendy are based on a typical unil slice of the <br />wall/soil syslem. il may be necessary 10 consider several <br />slices in Ihe vicinily of the area load. <br /> <br />g. Point loads. A surcharge load distribuled over a <br />small area may be treaIed as a point load. Ihe equations <br />for evaluating IaIeraJ pressures are given in Figure 4-9. <br />Because the pressures vIII)' horizonlalJy parallel 10 Ihe <br />wall; il may be necessary 10 consider several unil slices <br />of the wall/soil syslem for design. <br /> <br />4-5. Water Loads <br /> <br />a. HydroslIllic prtSSlUt. A difference in water level <br />on either side of the wall creates an unbalanced hydro- <br />static pressure. Waler pressures are calculaled by <br />multiplying Ihe waler deplh by ils specific weight. If a <br />nooflow hydrosla1ic condition is assumed, i.e. seepage <br /> <br />4-6 <br /> <br />effecls negJecled, Ihe unbalanced hydrostatic pressure is <br />assumed 10 acl along Ihe entire deplh of embedment. . <br />Waler pressure must be added 10 Ihe effective soil pres- '. <br />sures 10 oblain IoIaI pressures. <br /> <br />b. Seepage effects. Where seepage occurs, Ihe dif- <br />ferential waler pressure is dissipaled by vertical flow <br />beneath Ihe sheeI pile wall. This distribution of Ihe <br />unbalanced waler pressure can be oblained from a <br />seepage analysis. The analysis should consider Ihe <br />penneabilily of Ihe slUTOUnding soils as well as Ihe <br />effectiveness of any drains if presenL Techniques of <br />seepage analysis applicable 10 sheel pile wall design <br />include flow nels, line of creep melhod, and method of <br />fragmenls. These simplified techniques mayor may not <br />yield conservative resulls. Therefore, il is Ihe designer's <br />responsibilily 10 decide whether Ihe final design should <br />be based on a more rigorous analysis, such as Ihe finile <br />elemenl melhod. Upward seepage in fronl of Ihe sheel <br />pile wall lends 10 reduce Ihe effective weight of Ihe soil. <br />Ihus reducing ils abilily 10 offer Ialeral support. In <br />previous maleriaI Ihe effecls of upward seepage can <br />cause piping of maleriaI away from the wall or, in <br />exlreme cases, cause the soil 10 liquefy. Lenglhening <br />Ihe sheet pile, Ihus increasing Ihe seepage paIh, is one <br />effective melhod of accommodating seepage. For sheel <br />pile walls thai relain backfill, a drainage colleclor sys- <br />tem is recommended, Some methods of seepage analy- <br />sis are discussed in EM 1110-2-1901. <br /> <br />e) <br /> <br />c . Wave action. The laleral forces produced by <br />wave action are dependenl on many faclors, such as <br />lenglh, heigh!, breaking poin!, frequency and deplh at <br />struclure, Wave forces for a range of possible waler <br />levels should be delermined in accordance wilh Ihe <br />U,S. Anny CoasIaI Engineering Research Cenler Shore <br />ProIection Manual (USAEWES 1984). <br /> <br />4-6. Additional Applied Loads <br /> <br />Sheet Pile walls are widely used in many applications <br />and can be subjected to a number of additional loads, <br />other Ihan Ialeral pressure exerted by soil and waler, <br /> <br />a. Boat impact, Allhough it becomes impractical 10 <br />design a sheet pile wall for impacl by large vessels, <br />waafronl stnJclures can be struck by loose barges or <br />smaller vessels propelled by winds or cwrenls. Con- <br />struction of a submerged berm thai would ground a <br />vessel will greatly reduce lhis possibilily of impacL <br />When the sheet pile structure is subject 10 docking <br />impact, a fender system should be provided 10 absorb <br /> <br />e) <br />