Laserfiche WebLink
<br />area resulted in unusually high snowmelt floods. <br /> <br />Flood losses can include damage to grazing lands; irrigation systems; <br />fences; residential and commerc.ial buildings; parks and other recrea- <br />tional facilities; roads; bridges; and public utilities. Stream <br />channels may be subject to severe erosion. <br /> <br />2.4 Flood Protection Measures <br /> <br />There are several small lakes and reservoirs in Pitkin County, <br />mostly located within the upper watersheds of the Roaring Fork <br />River. The Twin Lakes diversion reservoir controls flows from <br />only a lS-square-mile drainage area and is intended to provide <br />storage for irrigation and water supply. The above measures are <br />insufficient for flood protection. A few temporary or localized <br />flood protection works, including berms, levees, and bank protection <br />works, are scattered near deve~oped areas. <br /> <br />The Fryingpan and Roaring Fork Rivers exist in deep channels. No <br />authorized flood-control structures are in the local study area, <br />and none are under investigation. <br /> <br />The only substantial structure that affects the flow of the Frying- <br />pan River is the Ruedi Dam, looated approximately 17 miles east <br />of Basalt. The Ruedi Dam is part of the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project <br />to divert water from the Colorado River basin to the Arkansas River <br />basin. The dam was designed for an inflow design flood of 17,500 <br />cfs at a lS-day volume of 110,000 acre-feet. The probable maximum <br />discharge is 5,540 cfs from the spillway and 1,810 cfs from the <br />outlet structure. The total p~obable maximum discharge from the <br />outlet structure and spillway is 7,350 cfs, approximating the 500- <br />year flood in the Town of Basalt (Reference 8). <br /> <br />A SOO-foot reach of the Roaring Fork River, located approximately <br />800 feet upstream of North Mill Street in Aspen, was widened in <br />December 1984. <br /> <br />Current regulations in Pitkin County limit construction in flood- <br />prone areas, thus contributing.to reduction in future flood potential. <br />No other flood plain management measures are in effect in Pitkin <br />County. <br /> <br />3.0 ENGINEERING METHODS <br /> <br />For the flooding sources studied in detail in the community, standard <br />hydrologic and hydraulic study methods were used to determine the flood <br />hazard data required for this study. Flood events of a magnitude which <br />are expected to be equaled or exceeded once on the average during any <br />10-, 50-, 100-, or SOO-year period (~ecurrence interval) have been select- <br />ed as having special significance fo~ flood plain management and for <br /> <br />8 <br />