My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03408
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03408
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:27:12 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:45:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Logan
Basin
South Platte
Title
City of Sterling Floodplain Analysis Pawnee Creek Overflows
Date
2/3/1997
Prepared For
Sterling
Prepared By
ICON Engineering, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Wayne Bethurum <br />February 3, 1997 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />In order to determine the floodplain and base flood elevations, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers <br />HEC-2 computer program was used, Existing mapping, provided by the City of Sterling, was <br />used to generate cross sections along the Pawnee Creek Overflow route from Iris Drive to <br />County Road 29, The mapping provided was at a scale of I" = 400', with 2 foot contour <br />intervals, This information was supplemented with field survey data, provided by Leibert- <br />McAtee & Associates, depicting a profile of Iris Drive and the highest embankment of the <br />Sterling No. I Ditch, from Iris Drive to Highway 138, The starting water surface at Iris Drive <br />was determined by using an equation for broad-crested weir flow. The water surface eleyation <br />determined using this method was 3953.18, which nearly matches the 100-year water surface <br />elevation (3953.20) presented in the 1983 study completed by Charles Leaf, To ensure <br />consistent results, 3953,20 was accepted as the 100-year water surface elevation at Iris Drive and <br />was used in our model. The I OO-year discharge used for this analysis was 5,000 cfs. <br /> <br />The water surface profile generated using the HEC-2 Model was plotted along with the field data <br />provided by Leibert & McAtee to estimate where overtopping would occur during the lOO-year <br />event. A copy of this plot is presented on Sheet 2 of 2 and enclosed with this letter for your use. <br />Based on our evaluation, two locations along the ditch embankment were identified where <br />overtopping would occur. Area one is located just south of Iris Drive. At this location <br />stormwater will overtop the ditch embankment and will sheet flow to the east along Iris Drive <br />and have depths of less than I foot. The second area where stormwater will overtop the ditch <br />embankment is located just west of the proposed Design Technics Subdivision, To determine the <br />amount of storm water that would overtop the ditch at this location, rating curves were developed <br />for the section along the ditch and also for HEC-2 cross-section number 40, Based on these <br />rating curves, approximately 600 cfs would overtop the ditch at this location during the 100-year <br />event and sheet flow northeast across the subdivision, Using normal depth, we estimated that <br />this sheet flow would spread to an approximate width of 1,600 feet at a depth of about OJ feet <br />(four inches), The resulting sheet flow area is shown on the map and plotted based on the slope <br />of the existing topography, A reduction of flow for downstream sections were not used, since <br />there was little impact in water surface elevations, <br /> <br />It should be noted that the floodplain shown on Sheet I of 2 depicts areas of flooding based on <br />the existing mapping and the assumption that the ditch embankment serves as a levee and does <br />not fail during overtopping. FEMA has specific criteria regarding levees and how they confine <br />potential flooding. It is possible that FEMA would not consider this ditch to act as a levee and <br />therefore not confine the flows to the east. If specific FEMA map revisions are required, this <br />area will have to be reviewed for conformance by FEMA. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.