Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Institutional Interaction in Stormwater Management <br /> <br />Because stormwater management in urban and metropolitan areas is engaged in by <br />both public and private institutions, it is not surprising that the approaches <br />adopted and proposed are varied and often conflicting. The private institutions, <br />primarily land developers and land owners, number in the thousands. The many public <br />institutions involved include: local, state and federal governments and agencies; <br />planning commissions; drainage and flood control districts; some sanitary districts; <br />and various special-purpose public agencies that have a role in stormwater manage- <br />ment. The latter includes park districts, forest preserve districts, conservation <br />districts, and others. Five example situations are described here to illustrate <br />the kinds of interaction that may develop between these various institutions. <br /> <br />New Land Developments. In this situation, the land developer first <br />approaches the local government responsible for zoning, and requests a change in <br />zoning to accommodate his plans. In terms of surface drainage, the developer <br />usually is required to prepare a site plan or preliminary subdivision plat to demon- <br />strate basic feasibility. If and when the requested zoning is approved, the devel- <br />oper's engineer prepares detailed drainage plans which become part of the develop- <br />ment plans submitted by the developer. The local government then reviews the plans <br />and either approves or disapproves them. The developer must also satisfy the drain- <br />age requirements of the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) if FHA financing is <br />involved. Before the buildings are occupied, the developer must satisfy the lcoal <br />government that all construction conforms to the approved plans. Other local agen- <br />cies may also become involved. For example, in Tulsa, Oklahoma, all land develop- <br />ments must be approved by the Tulsa Metropolitan Area Planning Commission. It is <br />an agency separate from either the City or County of Tulsa, and it has planning and <br />responsibilities for all land developments in the area. <br /> <br />In instances where construction of bridges over navigable streams is required, <br />the state highway departments and the U.S. Corps of Engineers will usually have <br />approval authority. When rivers are involved, the Corps of Engineers and the U.S. <br />Environmental Protection Agency, as well as the state environmental protection <br />agency, will ordinarily have to be consulted, and construction permits may be <br />required. For land developments proposing surface drainage systems that may affect <br />neighboring or downstream jurisdictions or unincorporated portions of a county, <br />approvals should be requested from these respective governments. Also, most state <br />laws (in the United States) require that land development plans be submitted for <br />review and comment by nearby municipalities when such proposed developments are <br />within a stipulated distance from corporate boundaries. <br /> <br />Developed Areas With Drainage Problems. In situations where a developed <br />area has drainage problems or minor local flooding problems (e.g., sewer backups), <br />property owners are the "initiators". They usually make their complaints to the <br />local government. One solution approach for local government is to form a special <br />improvement district that relates to specific property owners and their drainage <br />problems. The local government may then retain a consultant to design improvements <br />and a contractor to construct the improvements on behalf of the special improvement <br />district. The cost of such improvements are charged through the special improve- <br />ment district directly to the property owners benefited. This entire process is a <br />remedial action and, often,is a consequence of poor planning, or none. <br /> <br />Regulation of Floodplains. Justification for regulation of floodplains is <br />the health, safety, and welfare of the public. In most states, regulation of flood- <br />plains is the responsibility of local government; however, some state governments <br />(e.g., Illinois) are implementing and enforcing floodplain regulations in urban and <br /> <br />41 <br />