My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03361
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03361
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:27:04 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:41:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
Designation Number
299
County
Costilla
Community
Unincorporated Costilla County
Stream Name
Trinchera Creek, Culebra Creek, Colstilla Creek
Basin
Rio Grande
Title
CWCB Review Report - Floodplain Information Report - for the Rio Grande, Trinchera Creek, Culebra Creek, Colstilla Creek, and Selected Tributaries in Costilla County
Date
3/1/1989
Designation Date
11/1/1989
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Color<<c\(, WOlter Conservation Board <br />Flood Control and Floodplain Management Section <br /> <br />M E M 0 RAN 0 U M <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Bill McDonald, Director <br /> <br />wjA <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />SUBJECT: <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />I have reviewed the rt~quest for a variance from rule(s) <br />submi tted by <br />of the <br /> <br />_,""._1 <br /> <br />dated <br /> <br />, and recei ved by the board on <br />and have determined that: <br /> <br />1. The following affected communities should be notified by the <br />. applicant in writing: <br /> <br />2. The estimated changes in water surface elevation, floodplain area, <br />or flood velocities appear to be (if applicable): <br /> <br />s igni ficant <br /> <br />insignificant <br /> <br />3. Approximately <br />potentially be negatively <br />(if applicable) <br /> <br />people in structures could <br />affected by approval of the variance <br /> <br />4. The evidence submitted in accordance with the rule is <br /> <br />sufficient <br />for the board to make a decision. <br /> <br />insufficient <br /> <br />Therefore, I I"ecolllmend that the request for a variance be <br /> <br />presented to the board for consideration. <br /> <br />returned to the r'eques tor wi th deficiencies noted. <br /> <br />-13-.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.