My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03360
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03360
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:27:03 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:40:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Elbert
Stream Name
Kiowa Creek
Basin
South Platte
Title
Floodplain Information Report
Date
1/1/1976
Prepared For
Elbert County
Prepared By
United Western Engineers
Contract/PO #
&&
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />for use of CRSP facilities, less the estimated revenue for wheeling power <br />for Ute and SRP. The 3-year average annual transmission capacity <br />commitments were 1,580.7 MW, which consisted of 1,195.4 MW for the installed, <br />capacity of the CRSP plants and 385.3 MW for Ute and SRP. Dividing the <br />average annual cost of $10,453,000 by the capacity of 1,580,700 kW resulted <br />in a unit cost of $6.61 which was rounded to $6.60 per kW-year for the <br />established firm transmission rate. The nonfirm transmission rate of 1 mill <br />per kWh was not revised. <br /> <br />V. PROPOSED TRANSMISSION RATES <br />Based on data available as of the end of FY 1981, projections were <br />made, as shown on Table 1, for the three ensuing years of FY 1982, 1983, and <br />1984 as to the anticipated transmission system investment and OM&R costs; <br />costs of wheeling over other systems; revenues for rental of CRSP <br />transmission facilities; and revenues from Ute and SRP because of the <br />exchange of Ute and SRP coal-fired generationifor CRSP hydro generation. <br />Table 1 also shows the estimated transmission!capacity commitments and the <br />annual cost per kW for each of the three futu~e years FY 1982, 1983, and <br />1984. The average cost per kW for the three jears, $10.27 per kW-year, is <br />proposed as tne firm transmission rate. A new non-firm transmission rate of <br />2 mi 11 s per kWh is also proposed. Two mill s per kWh is the energy rate <br />obtained by applying an annual load factor of 58.2 percent to the firm <br />transmission rate of $10.27 per kilowatt year. Both rates should become <br />effective April 1, 1983, or as soon thereafter as possible, where existing <br />contracts do not permit changes by then. A special nonfirm transmission <br />rate of 1 mi 11 /hWh for the return of emergency ass i stance is under <br />consideration. <br /> <br />The annual replacement cost shown for each year on Table 1 is the <br />average of the estimated CRSP transmission replacements for the FY 1982-2090 <br />period, rather than the replacements which are actually anticipated in the <br />next 3 years. This average method appears more appropriate, since the <br />prOjections for the next 3 years include extraordinarily high costs due to <br />the replacement of the CRSP supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) <br />system. \ <br /> <br />Figure 2 shows the historical and proposed firm and non-firm <br />transmission rates. <br /> <br />VI. HISTORY OF FIRM POWER RATES <br />The first CRSP firm power rate, the R4-Fl schedule, was established on <br />March 6, 1962. The charges were: <br /> <br />3 mills per kWh for energy and <br />$1.275 per kW/Month for capacity. <br /> <br />Under the 1962 marketing criteria, custdmers with no supplemental <br />supply were permitted to receive their total energy requirements. Customers <br />with a supplemental supply were permitted to take up to 70 percent seasonal <br />load factor energy through March 1976. The average rate at 58.2 percent <br />, seasona 1 load factor was 6 mi 11 s per kWh. <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.