My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03351
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03351
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:27:01 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:40:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Engineering and Design Hydraulic Design of Flood Control Channels
Date
7/1/1991
Prepared By
US Army Corps of Engineers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
158
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Chapter 2 <br />Open Channel Hydraulic Theory <br /> <br />2-1. PhySical Hydraulic Elements <br /> <br />Q, General, The physical hydraulic elements con- <br />cerned in hydraulic design of channels consist of inven <br />slope (5.,). cross-sectional area (A). wetted perimeter (Pl. <br />and equivalent boundary sunace roughness (k). The <br />hydraulic r:ulius (R) used in resistance fonnulae is the <br />ratio NP. The invert slope of proposed channel im- <br />provement is conlrOlled primarily by elevations of the <br />ground along the alignment as determined by preliminary <br />layout discussed in paragraph 1-6<1, A center-line prof1Ie <br />between conlrOlling elevations along the proposed align- <br />ment will indicale a preliminary channel slope. <br /> <br />b, Channel cross secrion. <br /> <br />(1) The proper channel cross section for a given <br />re:lCh is the one that has adequate hydraulic capacity for a <br />minimum cost of construction and maintenance. The <br />economics must include the costs of right-of-way and <br />structures such as bridges, In nual areas a trapezoidal <br />cross section may be le:lSt costly. whereas in urban areas <br />a rectangular cross section is often the least costly. <br /> <br />(2) Plate 1 shows a sample cost compUl:ltion and <br />related cost curve for a reach of curved rectangular con- <br />crete channel. Similar procedures may be applied to <br />compute the COSI for any type of cross section considered <br />for design. Special types of concrete channel cross sec- <br />tions are shown in Plate 2: the V -bottom channel and the <br />modified trapezoidal channel. The latter has a small <br />low-flow channel in the center. <br /> <br />(a) In the V-bottom channel. low flows are concen- <br />trated along the channel center line. This prevents moder- <br />ate flow from meandering over the entire channel width. <br />which would result in random deposition of material <br />across the inven as in the case of a horizontll bottom. <br />Deposition in the center of the V -bottom is removed by <br />larger flows. Because the We:l1" caused by bed load is <br />also concentrated ne:l1" the center line. maintenance cost is <br />reduced. <br /> <br />(b) In the modified trapezoidal cross section, vettical <br />sidewalls reduce the top width. This design is desirable <br />when the width of the right-of,way is limited. A small. <br />l~w,flow channel in the center of the cross section pro- <br />VIdes a flow way into which subdrninage can be emptied. <br />In cold climates_ the low-flow channel reduces the inven <br />area subjecled to the deleterious effects of freezing and <br /> <br />EM 1110.2-1601 <br />1 Jul 91 <br /> <br />thawing. In some cases the low. flow channel may serve <br />as a fishway, <br /> <br />c. Roughness. The concept of surface roughness as <br />the basic parameter in flow resistance (friction) is almost <br />wuversally accepted. Absolute roughness is detennined <br />fro,~ the physical dimensions of the wetted surface irregu- <br />lan~es and IS nonnally of theoretical interest only. <br />Eqwvalenl roughness is a 1ine:l1" dimension (effective <br />roughness height) directly related to the bound:uy resis- <br />tance of the channel (plate 3). The relations between <br />roughness and the various coefficients for friction fonnu- <br />Ia.: ~ adequately covered by Chow (1959, chap 8). <br />Fnction fonnulae and their uses are discussed in <br />paragraph 2-2. below. <br /> <br />d, Composite roughness, Wllere there is material <br />variation ~ roughness between various portions of the <br />wetted penrneter such as might be found in nalIJr.ll chan- <br />nels or channels with protected banks and natural inverts_ <br />an equivalent or effective roughness or friction coefficient <br />f~r eac~ st:lge considered should be detennined. Appen- <br />dix C Illustrates a method for detennining a composite <br />~alue of k for each st:lge. Plates 4 and 5 give the rela- <br />tion between k and Manning's n for flows in the rough <br />flow zone shown in Plate 3. HDC sheets 631-4 and <br />631-4{1 also give a procedure for determining an effective <br />Manning's n. <br /> <br />e, Hydraulic efficiency. The problem of the most <br />efficient cross section is treated by Brater and King <br />(1976_ see pp 7-5 to 7-7) and Chow (1959. see <br />paragraph 7-6). <br /> <br />2.2. Hydraulic DesIgn Aspects <br /> <br />Q, General, This present:ltion assumes that the <br />design engineer is fully acquainted with the hydraulic <br />theories involved in unifonn and gradually varied flows, <br />steady and unsteady flows. energy and momentum princi- <br />ples. and other aspects such as friction related to <br />hydraulic design nonnally covered in hydraulic texts and <br />handbooks such as those by Brater and King (1976) and <br />Chow (1959). The following is presented as guidance in <br />the method of application of textbook material and to give <br />additional infonnation not readily available in reference <br />material. The use of k is emphasized herein because <br />compul:ltional results are relatively insensitive to errors in <br />assigned values of k. However. use of Manning's n <br />has been retained in several procedures because of its <br />wide accepl:lllce and simplicity of use. This applies <br />panicularly to varied flow profiles. pulsating flow, and the <br />design of free,surface hydraulic models. <br /> <br />2-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.