My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03331
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03331
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:26:58 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:40:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Gunnison
Community
Uncompahgre Valley
Basin
Gunnison
Title
Uncompahgre Valley Reclamation Project - Hydropower - Part 3 - Environmental Impact Statement DRAFT
Date
4/19/1989
Floodplain - Doc Type
Project
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
331
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CHAPTER 1 <br /> <br />PURPOSE AND NEED <br /> <br />Electrical Power <br /> <br />Power from the proposed facility would be sold to local <br />utilities. For the first 15 years of project operation, capacity <br />and energy would be sold to the Public Service Company of <br />Colorado for resale to its customers. The 15-year power sales <br />contract signed in 1988 would coincide with the financing term <br />for project related debt. Beginning in year 16, the Sponsors <br />would be free to select a different power purchaser for the <br />balance of the lease term with Reclamation. <br /> <br />Under the Public Utilities Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 <br />(PURPA), Sponsors are assured a market for project power at rates <br />not to exceed the purchasing utility's "avoided cost." Avoided <br />cost is generally defined as the cost a utility would incur to <br />provide an equivalent amount of generation. The avoided cost <br />standard was developed to ensure that electric rate payers would <br />be indifferent to such purchases. Power sales from the project <br />at rates less than or equal to avoided costs would thus be <br />economical when compared to other alternatives. <br /> <br />Electrical power needs within specific service territories are <br />forecast by individual utilities. Public Service Company of <br />Colorado, in their 1987 forecast of loads and resources <br />(PSCo, 1987), showed the need for 472 megawatts (MW) of <br />additional capacity to meet minimum reserve criteria in 1992 (the <br />facility's first year of operation), increasing to over 1,100 MW <br />by 1996 (the last year in the 10-year forecast). The December <br />1988 version of this plan (PSCo, 1988) showed power needs to <br />range from 500 MW in 1992 to 1,000 MW by 1998. Generation from <br />the proposed project, as well as other independent small power <br />producers, is expected to fill a portion of that need. In <br />accordance with those forecasts and conditions, the project's <br />power sales agreement was approved by the Colorado Public <br />Utilities Commission in June 1988 (CPUC, 1988). <br /> <br />Demand forecasts for the larger Rocky Mountain Power Area <br />(Colorado and parts of Wyoming and South Dakota) are published <br />annually by the Western Systems Coordinating Council (WSCC). The <br />1988 WSCC forecast showed the need for 1,568 MW of new capacity <br />in the area from 1988 to 1997 (WSCC, 1988). The Federal Energy <br />Regulatory Commission (FERC) also provides independent <br />assessments of power needs. Within Colorado in 1988, FERC has <br />established the need for new power resources in environmental <br />assessments for hydropower projects at paonia Dam (44FERC 62,010 <br />7/1/88), Lemon Dam (43FERC 62,305 6/16/88), and Maroon Creek <br />(Project 10,441, 7/20/88). The proposed AB Lateral Facility, <br />under a 40-year lease from Reclamation and with a potential <br />100-year project life, would be useful in meeting a portion of <br /> <br />1 -4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.