|
<br />Table 8
<br />Preliminary Cost Estimate
<br />Alternative No.6
<br />Atwood Bypass Channel
<br />
<br />A contingency of 15 percent of the construetion eost was added to all estimate" This contingency is
<br />intended to cover incidental costs that wO\lld bI: a,sociated with these types of projects but are not
<br />idemificd with the conccplual kvcl of details,
<br />
<br />Engineering will illduuc ue,ign u"d eUll,tluctiul\ ~urv~y;llg allJ WUS a~:mm~d 10 be 12 percent oftOlal
<br />can8tructioll C()~ts,
<br />
<br /> Item Unit Quantit UnitCoo;t Cost
<br />, General
<br /> Mobilizallcn " , $50,000 S50,000
<br /> Traffic Control L5 , $50,000 550,000
<br />, Bypass Levee
<br /> Cleanng&Grubbmg AC ;0 $500 525,000
<br /> Remove and Replace Topsoil " 80.000 $2 5160,000
<br /> Earthworl; for8.ft Easl Levee CY 268,800 $3 5806,400
<br /> Earthworl<. for8.tt West Levee CY 113AOO 52 $340200
<br /> Seeding and Revegetation " " 53.500 $220,500
<br /> Temporarylrriga\lOn L5 , S10,OOO $10,OOQ
<br />2 Low Flow Splitter " 50 5500 $25,000
<br /> Seeding and Revegetation AC 2 $3,500 $10,500
<br />, Railroad Soil Cement " 2800 $100 $280,000
<br />5 S, Platte Return Dike
<br /> Clearing & Grubbing AC , $500 $3,500
<br /> Remo'leJndRcplaceTopsoil CY 11,100 $3 S22,200
<br /> E:arthworkfur5-rtLev.... CY 35,000 " $105,000
<br /> Seeding and Revegelation ^C " $3,500 $35,000
<br />0, Road Closure LS , $10,000 $10.000
<br />
<br />Legal, fiscal, and administration cost, were assumed to he 5 peTeentofthetot~leQnstructioncost. In
<br />the following tables are presenled the estimuted project cost far the Pa"nee Creek Improvements
<br />Alteffiiltive Nos, 2 through 6 respectively, Tabl~ 9 pr~~,;mt~ a summary of the eo,t8 f()f eaeh
<br />altemativ~.
<br />
<br />Table 9. Altcrnlltivt Cpst Summa!')'
<br />
<br />Hem AltNo. , AltNo.2 AltNo,3 All No.Au!". Alt.No:S,.0 AltNo.6,"Ij
<br />C(}n.~tructi"n None $1,1l9,~n $20.091,700 $2,012,953 $2,691,000 $2,476,000
<br />EngJAdmin None $ 190,379 $ 6,228,421it342,202 $ 458,000 $ 421,000
<br />Land Nane $ 29,750 $ 1,045,75~ 65,000 , 65,000 $ 500,000
<br />Total None 1,340,007" $27,365.885 $2,420,155 $3,214,000 $.,397,000
<br />
<br />Docs lIU: include CDOT bridge e08ts "hieh arc budgeted for the year 2001 to replac.: th~ structurally
<br />and functionally "k~oletc IIWY 6 (Northbounrl) Bridge. Costs are included for il1creasing the south
<br />bound brid!,\~ hydnmlie c"P'""~':'- ~_~." :,~rl ()fth( ~lul-"-':'~d project.
<br />
<br />FundinltSQurces
<br />
<br />Act\lalprnjeeteds()\lrceofflJnJ~orconll:"Uli()n8indudethefol1owiJIg:
<br />
<br />Subtot;ll
<br />15%Collhllg€nGY
<br />
<br />52,153,300
<br />$322,995
<br />
<br />Engir\eenng Costs (12%)
<br />Legal, Flscal & Admllllstratlon (5%)
<br />Land Acquisilion (Chdn"eIEasernent)
<br />Land AcquIsition (Leveesl
<br />
<br />"
<br />AC
<br />
<br />$500
<br />$2,500
<br />
<br />$297,155
<br />$123,815
<br />5375,000
<br />$125.000
<br />
<br />Public:
<br />F~d~ral Fund~:
<br />StakFUJ1d8.
<br />City Fllnds:
<br />County Funds:
<br />
<br />$1,041,864
<br />$1,160.000
<br />$ 813,136
<br />$ 200.000
<br />
<br />$ubtotalCollstrucllonCost
<br />
<br />$2,476,295
<br />
<br />;;0
<br />;0
<br />
<br />Pnvme:
<br />
<br />S 0
<br />
<br />TOTAL
<br />
<br />$].215,000
<br />
<br />Total Projeel Cost
<br />
<br />53.397.265
<br />
<br />\--'111. S~:!oECr.n) ALn:K~ATlV~
<br />
<br />"
<br />
<br />A conccplllal d<:Slgll j'", <:ach of the alteTl1dtivc major proJ~"Ct dcm<:llls was eOrllp!clt.'t! in sunicitm
<br /><ktail tel dderrnine C()118tnl~ti()n 'luanlitiL'~ anJ C,,"I t'stimul<'s, All of thr rroj~'Cts w~re then re\'1<~wed
<br />~nJ studird in or,kr to d<:v~l"T' ~ projt.(:t sdC-<:lion matrix. S,'n'r~1 f",:tors we1'l' used 10 ev~luatc and
<br />rriorilm' Ihr project' and th~ir cnlllpnll~l1t< Fach Alternatiw wa, ranked from 1 thmllgh 6 with thr
<br />highest rank~d alt~mativr receiving the most points. ElIeh faclor Was giv~n a weigbting factor hasrJ
<br />upon the rclati\'~ importanc~ ()f lhe fuctor Th~ higher th~ wdghting factor, the nwre point~ scored.
<br />The total weighting factor~ <Ire 100. Thus if an alternative was ranked first in every cattlgory it would
<br />
<br />"
<br />
|