My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03324
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03324
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:26:56 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:39:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Logan
Community
Sterling
Stream Name
Pawnee Creek
Basin
South Platte
Title
Flood Hazard Mitigation Feasibility Study
Date
3/1/2001
Prepared For
Logan County
Prepared By
ICON Engineering, Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Project
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
141
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />expanded by adding 4 cells of20' wide X 8' tall RCBs to the south of the existing bridg"" Th", existing <br />timbl'r bridge along the northbound lanes would be replaced. The CDOT currently has plans to replace <br />the timhcr bridge within the next 3 to 5 years. In the summer of 1996, Ihe UPRRlBNRR replaced their <br />bridg.: IUC<lted just downstr",am of HWY 6 for slruetural reasons. /k"ign of tht: new railroad bridge <br />was such that the new bridge will ultimatclyconvey the lOO-yearpeakdiseharge. Since the proposed <br />bridge improvemellts would all"w more flow downstream of HWY 6, a second system of levees and a <br />tloodwall arc proposed to confine storm water downstream of the highway to the 100-year floodplain <br />of the South Platte River. The estimated prujttl cust of the proposed improvements along Pawnee <br />Creek is $1,135.500. Ibis cost does not include the new bridge at HWY 6 by CDOT or the newly <br />constructedrailmadcrussingbyuPRR. <br /> <br />These proposed improvements would eliminate tht: Pawnee Cn..'ek oved1ows from draining into the <br />City. The overflows are estimated 10 be about 5,000 cfs during the I OO-year storm. Eliminating these <br />overflows removes a substantial amount of land and many structures !Tom the floodplain in both Logan <br />County and the City of Sterling. <br /> <br />Altunative No. .,. This alternalive is a ~ries (If upstream flood control reservoirs as presented in the <br />report entilled "Flood Plain Management Study, Pawnec Crcek and Logan Creek, Colorado" datcd <br />April 1992, This alternative will storc lJo\ldwaters in detention structures in thc upper watershed. <br />General location ofthc reservoirs is sh\lwnon Figure 10. <br /> <br />Alternative !'io. 4: This alternative will e\lllect the Pawn~'e Creek over/low und divert these flows <br />directly to the South Plalte River in the general vicinity of the Cemetery ju.st south of Sterling, This <br />altern"tlve consists of construction ofa ~rm havinl:\unapproximat..,h..,i;thtoI5 feet to thc north and <br />,,"'st of the Riverside Cemetery. This bcnm would collect and prevent flnws from the Pawnee <br />nvertlow fmm emering the Cit), along the HWY 6iRailroad cmb,mkments. Inclu(kd in Ihc alternative <br />is lowering of CR. 24, construction of a channel with a concrete flondwall, a closure structure for <br />HWY 6. construction of box culverts under the railroad, a siphon for the Sterling No. I Oitch, and <br />C(lnslrU<.:tiull of a trapezoidal channel to the South Platte River. lbis alternative is shown on Figure II. <br /> <br />Alternative No. S: The propos<:d alternative will provide a conveyance structure at Town of Atwood, <br />increasing the bridge capadtics at the main,tcm of Pawnee Creek, channel cleaning, (debris removal) <br />and stabilization mcasures upstream ofIIWY 6 to CR 29, and the project features of Alternative No.4. <br />This alternative e(m~ist~ uf constmetior! of Alternative No.4, along with modifications and new HWY <br />6 bridgc~. cbanne1 and levee impmvcments down~tream ofth", llPRR at Town of Atwood. Flows in <br />excess llf the design event on the mainstem would thus r!ecc~.~iW.t", providing the project features at the <br />Riverside Cemetery, Alternative No, 5 would d('el"t.~se the $t'verity of the IOD-year flood event in the <br />area wcst of H\VY 6 b<:twt--cn the Pawn"'e Creek Bridge and the Cemetery. hut wOl1ld nm eliminate 1111 <br />ovcrlJo,,"'s. In addition, Ihis alternative would provide /1ond benefits to the community of Atwood <br />Thisaltemative is shown on Figure 12. <br /> <br />AllernQtin :-00. 6: This alternative provides a drainage floodway upstrcillll of the Town of Atwood <br />thai ,Evens hwnee Creek to tile south, ai",,1/. CR 29 <iir~'Clly 10 th<.' :)outh t'bUe Klver. I he tloodway <br />would be sized for the' 100-year storm peak flow and wpuld handle a discharge cquall<l the July 19'17 <br />Hood evental thai location. Thisaltcmative wouid require crossings for the Pawne.: lrri~ation Ditch. <br />and j100th HWY 6 and the \JI'RR. 'lhis alternative is shown on Figure 13. <br /> <br />" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.