|
<br />.Z-;...<--
<br />7ZIb
<br />
<br />FLOOD HAZARD MITIGATION
<br />FEASIBILITY STUDY
<br />
<br />STATE OF COLORADO
<br />
<br />Q
<br />
<br />
<br />Colorado Water Conservation Board
<br />Oepdrtment of Natural Resources
<br />I)" '"","',," >c-...,,, ~(J"," '"
<br />:;"'..".Col""cto'mOJ
<br />"",)00.,:1111"."',-.,.-:1
<br />FAX':'W!''''''".""
<br />'MW'.'-""-,""",",,"",
<br />
<br />~':(.>.-""
<br />~'''''"''''
<br />
<br />FEASIBILITY STUDY REVIEW MEMO
<br />
<br />C"'liE w,.,,,
<br />""'",,.."'''',",
<br />
<br />June 26, 1001
<br />
<br />',,o""""'"
<br />~"c, ~.,,""
<br />O,,"MJ\~'"
<br />o.oAyD.,,"'"
<br />
<br />Rcport: City ojSluling, Pawnee Creek Flood Ha::ard Miligarion Feasihiliiy Study
<br />
<br />con,ultant:lconEngineerip
<br />R~viewer: Bill Grcen~
<br />
<br />1. The appendices should be rei~,~nced in the text ofth~ report with 'appendix numbers.
<br />
<br />PAWNEE CREEK
<br />
<br />1. ThcJuiy10 City of Sterling election on the project should be mcntioncd in the report
<br />with results whenavailablc,
<br />
<br />J. ThG de,criplion of the s~;ec:~d ~lte:;:~tive should be revised to correspond w,th the
<br />results of the July lOeleelion and the City's final decision on the project. Revi~ed
<br />design~ and cost eSllmates should bc provided.
<br />
<br />Marrh2001
<br />
<br />City of Sterling
<br />CentenoialSquare
<br />421 North 4th Street
<br />Sterling,COS075!
<br />
<br />Colorado Water Conservation Board
<br />1313 Sbennan Street
<br />Room 721
<br />Deover,CO!<<l203
<br />
<br />Logan County
<br />315 Main
<br />Sterling. CO 807!i1
<br />
<br />4, The description of the financial program should be revised 10 rotlect the mostreeent
<br />costestimme including the amount of funding to be contributed by each funding
<br />sOl.lroe. (I umlerstand that FEMA may be able to contribute some additional funds to
<br />the project.) The financial projection in Appendix 7 for the Capilallmprovement
<br />Fl.lnd looks OK so long as the City is not intending to borrow more than th~ existing
<br />51,160.000 authorization from the CWeB,
<br />
<br />ICON Engineering, Inc
<br />8100Soutb Akron Way
<br />Suile300
<br />En~lewo()d. co 80112
<br />(303)221-0802
<br />
<br />5 fhenew design and cost estimate may require revisioJls to the econ omie
<br />(benefit/cost) analysis.
<br />
<br />6, Will the revise" dcsi.,'I\ require revislOns to thecnvironmcmal walyse s"
<br />
<br />~ Wilt there \:Ie change~ to the design and constrllction schelink on ?age 46~
<br />
<br />3, 0;; pa;;;: -43, :t~ :~~: i,.di;:;;:;::; :r...: ~.,:i;;-,~:~d ~~cod Ga;;-,~;;~" W~,C b;;..,.:d o~ :;:.~.::\;.",
<br />lllventoricdina 1<J83 report, Were structures bl.lilt since 19SJacco unledli.lr';
<br />
<br />9. l.:an't lind the reaches used lor damages on figllre 12 (mennonedon pagc.J.3l.
<br />
<br />F1".".; p"~",,,... w,,"" P''''''c< "hM;"~ ,'"0 "n",,, "'" "'e,'.... .",,1 ...,. ""'"''''''
<br />'_'No'""";.,.,.,,,,",;;,", (""',~e.-.",,"P!,co,,.,
<br />
|