Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />- <br /> <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />SECTION II <br />BAFFLED APRON DROPS <br /> <br />-5;"..~.:1::~~;;~;;~ <br />""~. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The UnIted States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) has developed design standards for <br />a reinforced concrete chute with baffle blocks on the sloping face of the drop. <br />They are commonly referred to as baffle block or baffle chute drops. There are <br />two excellent references, Hydraulic Design of Stilling Basins and Energy Disslpators <br />(ref. 34), and DeSIgn of Small Canal Structures (ref. 1), that should be used for the <br />design of these structures. Also, Design of Small Dams (ref. 7) presents information <br />on Lanes WeIghted Creep theory which can be used for simplified seepage analysis <br />of these and other drops. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The design is normally recommended for a unit width flow (q) of 35 cfs!ft or less <br />with the maximum (q) not to exceed 60 cfs!ft. In relationship to the channel Width, <br />this results in a well matched design for the UDFCD grass-lined channel criteria. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The hydraulic concept IS that all of the flow repeatedly encounters obstructions <br /> <br /> <br />that are of a nominal heIght eqUIvalent to crItical depth, leading to faIrly complete <br /> <br /> <br />energy loss because of the momentum loss assOCIated With reorientation of the flow. <br /> <br /> <br />Normally, a minimum of 4 rows of teeth are utIlized to achIeve dIsturbance of the <br /> <br /> <br />flow and dIssipatIOn of energy. GUidelines are gIven for SIZing and spacIng the <br /> <br /> <br />blocks. DeSIgning for proper approach velOCitIes IS CrItICal to structure performance. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />EffectIvely there are fixed costs regardless of drop height for approach walls, <br />minimum length of side walls, downstream transition walls and a minimum length of <br />sloping apron. The baffle chute becomes more economical with increasing drop height. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />This design is quite flexible in adaptation, once the hydraulic principals are understood. <br /> <br /> <br />For instance, for low drops, designs which use two rows of baffles on the slope and <br /> <br /> <br />two in the horizontal area below have been successful. Also, the apron can have <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />II-I <br /> <br />I <br />