My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03311
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03311
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:26:54 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:38:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
San Miguel
Community
Telluride
Stream Name
Cornet Creek
Basin
Gunnison
Title
Flood Hazard Delineation
Date
3/1/1989
Prepared For
FEMA
Prepared By
Simons Li & Associates Inc.
Floodplain - Doc Type
Floodplain Report/Masterplan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
99
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />4.10 <br /> <br />. Flood Insurance Study. Town of TellUlr'ide~ San MiQuel Counj;y (FIA, 1978). <br />Hydrologic analyses were conducted as part of this study to establish the <br />peak di scharge-frequency re 1 at i onshi ps for floods wi th rE!CUrrence i nterva 1 s of <br />10, 50, 100, and 500 years. Since Cornet Creek is ungaged, the Soil Conserv- <br />ation Service curve number method (SCS, 1975) was used. Peak discharges along <br />Cornet Creek identified for each of the selected recurrence interval s are <br />summarized on Table 4.1. A discharge of 1,500 cfs was also identified in this <br />study for a mud flow with a 100-year return period. This value was estimated <br />by assuming a 20 percent water content by wei~lht in the mud flow. <br />. Telluride. Colorado. Drainaqe Master _Plan (Dibble & Associates, 1983a). <br />Thi s study i nvo 1 ved the development of a master dra i nage plan for the town. <br />The investigation focused on street drainage within town limits. Quantities and <br />direction of flow were tabulated and depicted graphically. Peak runoff <br />discharges were determined for 10- and 25-year return period events by use of <br />the Rational Method. A summary of peak discharges at various concentration <br />points along the Cornet Creek is presented in Table 4.2. <br />The 25-year return period peak discharge is compared to that given in the <br />1978 FIS. The values calculated by the Rational Method were approximately 32 <br />percent greater than the FIS flow values. The difference in peak discharge ~as <br />cited in the report to be an acceptable approximation cons -ideri ng that the <br />Rational Method tends to over-estimate flows from drainagEs signHicantly greater <br />than 200 acres (the drainage area of Cornet Creek being approximately 1,540 <br />acres). As seen in Table 4.2, no explanation was provided in the report for <br />the di screpancy in the peak flow est imated at the northern town boundary and <br />downstream concentration points within the town. <br />. Debri sand Fl ood-Contro 1 F'l an for:_Cornet Cree!s,,-.-Ie 11 uride. Colorado <br />(Dibble & Associates, 1983b). <br />The objective of this study was to evaluate debris and flood-control <br />problems along Cornet Creek. The report included a description of the hydrologic <br />setting and historic flood problems along CornEt Creek, a review of the results <br />of the 1978 FIS for the town, and the results of backwater computations along <br />Cornet Creek for the 10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year FIS peak fl ows. A <br />recommended plan for debris and flood control along th,~ str€!am included the <br />following considerations: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.