Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2.5 <br /> <br />Conservation Board and the town was conductl~d on September 11 and 12, 1986. <br />After execution of the project contract with FEMA, a second deta i 1 ed fi e 1 d <br />reconnaissance was conducted by SLA personnel on October 5 through 9, 1987. The <br />detailed field reconnaissance included a cross-sectiona-I survey of the Cornet <br />Creek channel through the town, measurement of all hydraulic structures along <br />the stream and inspection of watershed areas. Several other tri ps to Tell uri de <br />by SLA project personnel were also used to further observe potential sediment <br />sources and the hydrologic character of watershed areas. <br /> <br />2.2.2 Watershed Observations <br />The Cornet Creek channel has incised through glacial and postglacial <br />deposits in the lower portion of the watershed, This material is believed to <br />be the major sediment source contributing to mud flow events. During the field <br />reconna i ssance, two slope fail ures were i dent i fi ed in the area that supply <br />sediment, boulders and debris to the channel. Both of the slope failures are <br />downstream of a 40-foot high waterfall located along the main Cornet Creek <br />channel. The mud and debris deposits at the mouth of Cornet Creek contain <br />substantial quantities of fine sediments such as clays, silts, and fine sand. <br />Significant fine sediment are not supplied from the upper watershed, <br />The upper Cornet Creek watershed does, however, provido significant runoff <br />area. The steep slopes, large areas of rock outcrop and lack of soils in the <br />upper basin promote rapid surface runoff. Significant runoff from the upper <br />watershed will entrain and transport material from lower areas of the basin <br />through channel and bank erosion. Unstable slopes abutting the creek in the <br />lower watershed provide a large source of transportable sediment resulting in <br />mud flows, as historically observed. <br /> <br />2.2.3 Channel Observations <br />Upstream of the canyon mouth to the location of the falls, the channel was <br />observed to be mildly obstructed by boulders and debris. The potE~ntial exists <br />for large volumes of sediment to be supplied to the channel during a significant <br />flood from several bank erosion areas in the lower watershed. In the central <br />port i on of the watershed, the channel is confi ned by steep valley slopes and <br />dense vegetation. High flows along the channel in this area would be inhibited <br />by the dense trees and vegetation growing adjacent to the channel. <br />