My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03304
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03304
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:26:53 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:38:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Community
State of Colorado
Stream Name
All
Basin
Statewide
Title
Colorado Flood Hydrology Manual
Date
1/1/1995
Prepared For
State of Colorado
Prepared By
CWCB
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
227
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CHAPTER 7 <br />HYDROLOGIC METHODS <br /> <br />PART I- PRECIPITATION <br /> <br />1. BACKGROUND THEORY. <br /> <br />Synthetic or hypothetical storms are frequently used by hydrologists and engineers <br />to generate synthetic flood events for evaluation of existing flood conditions and for study <br />of the effects of flood-mitigation components, The degree of dependency on synthetic <br />flood events during a flood evaluation depends generally on the number of gages and the <br />length of hydrologic record available, For reservoir studies there is typically at least one <br />long-record stream gage near the dam site, and thus the storage required for reservoir <br />food control is usually computed by period,of-record simulation techniques using recorded <br />data, Channels, levees, and other local protection projects are more likely to be sized by <br />synthetic storm-flood analyses since these projects often extend over many miles of the <br />stream, and it is rare that gage information would be available throughout tile reach, <br /> <br />Hypothetical storms are also used to ensure that rare storm.flood events are <br />included in an overall assessment of the proposal. Since large storms that cause major <br />floods are infrequent, the available runoff record quite possibly may not reflect the <br />occurrence of these rare events, Analyses of major reservoirs, although relying mainly on <br />recorded stream data, also require the use of synthetic storms (Standard Project and <br />Probable Maximum Storms) to evaluate the safety of major dam components, such as the <br />spillway and outlet works, and guard against overtopping of the dam, Synthetic <br />precipitation data are also used for analyses of flooding throughout a basin, testing of the <br />hydrologic effects of ailemative land uses and flood plain regulations, and evaluation and <br />design of flood control component$, This is usually done with a model of the watershed <br />to simulate the rainfall-runoff process, with the rainfall specffied by hypothetical storms, <br /> <br />2. DATA SOURCES. <br /> <br />The primary sources of hypothetical storm information for the United States are <br />various technical publications (iP) of the National Weather Service (/IIWS) and <br />hydrometeorological reports (HMR) of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric <br />Administration (NOAA), All publications for development of hypothetical frequency storms <br />feature generalized isopluvial rainfall maps and/or regression equations, Other methods, <br />such as statistical analysis of nearbY long-record rain gages to derive hypothetical storms <br />of particular frequencies in lieu of the NWS and NOAA procedures, are used extensively <br />in some parts of the United States but not discussed here, <br /> <br />Colorado Flood <br />Hydrology Manual <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />7,1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.