My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03276
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03276
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:26:48 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:37:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Hydrologic Engineering Methods for Water Resources Development Volume 4
Date
10/1/1973
Prepared For
US
Prepared By
US Army Corps of Engineers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CHAPTER 2. ANALYSIS OF PRECIPITATION <br /> <br />Section 2.01. Introduction <br /> <br />Precipitation is the general term for all forms of moisture emanating <br /> <br /> <br />from clouds and falling to the ground. The principal forms are dew, <br /> <br /> <br />rain, hail, sleet and snow. Estimates of intensity, depth and areal <br /> <br />distribution of precipitation will be discussed in this chapter. <br /> <br />Limitations in the application of precipitation data are largely <br /> <br /> <br />related to statistical sampling inadequacies. The existing precipitation <br /> <br /> <br />network in the United States and most other countries is ordinarily not <br /> <br /> <br />sufficiently dense to define storm precipitation for average depth over <br /> <br /> <br />areas of the size suited for hydrograph analysis. In fact, it is known <br /> <br /> <br />that many "cloudbursts" occur that are not recorded at any observation <br /> <br /> <br />station . <br /> <br /> <br />The nature of storm precipitation and the uses for which precipita- <br /> <br /> <br />tion data are intended should determine network density, since the <br /> <br /> <br />probability that a storm center will be defined adequately varies with <br /> <br /> <br />network density. A relatively sparse network of stations will often suf- <br /> <br /> <br />fice for studies of large general storms or for determining long-term <br /> <br /> <br />averages over large areas of level terrain, but a dense network is required <br /> <br /> <br />to delineate the rainfall pattern in small-area storms. <br /> <br /> <br />In this regard, it should be noted, however, that no feasible means <br /> <br />of accounting for all the effects of random variations in the areal <br /> <br />distribution of rainfall have been devised, nor is information on precip- <br /> <br /> <br />itation (and other hydrologic variables) sufficient to define areal varia- <br /> <br /> <br />tions accurately. Accordingly, some assumptions of uniformity in precipi- <br /> <br />tation patterns in subareas are necessary, and the maximum subarea size <br /> <br /> <br />feasible for hydro graph analysis is limited by the degree of random pre- <br /> <br /> <br />cipitation variation. This limitation can be relatively minor in areas <br /> <br /> <br />of general storms where precipitation is highly correlated from point to <br /> <br /> <br />point. On the other hand, it can be highly restrictive where precipitation <br /> <br /> <br />is erratic, as in areas that experience cloudbursts. <br /> <br />2-01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.