My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FLOOD03276
CWCB
>
Floodplain Documents
>
Backfile
>
3001-4000
>
FLOOD03276
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2010 6:26:48 PM
Creation date
10/4/2006 11:37:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Floodplain Documents
County
Statewide
Basin
Statewide
Title
Hydrologic Engineering Methods for Water Resources Development Volume 4
Date
10/1/1973
Prepared For
US
Prepared By
US Army Corps of Engineers
Floodplain - Doc Type
Educational/Technical/Reference Information
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ection 2.03. Estimatin2 Areal Depth of Precipitation <br /> <br />The average depth of precipitation over a specified area is required <br /> <br /> <br />in many hydrologic problems. The three most commonly used methods for <br /> <br /> <br />computing mean precipitation over an area are: (1) the station-average <br /> <br />method, (2) the Thiessen method and (3) the isohyetal method. These <br /> <br /> <br />methods are illustrated in fig. 2.02. In each of the methods, the accu- <br /> <br />racy with which rainfall depth over an area can be estimated depends on <br /> <br /> <br />the number and spacing of precipitation stations. In general, the larger <br /> <br /> <br />the area, the greater the number of sampling points included within the <br /> <br /> <br />area, and the greater the resulting accuracy of average depth determina- <br /> <br />tions. <br /> <br />Station-Avera~e Method <br /> <br />The simplest method to obtain the mean areal depth is to compute the <br /> <br /> <br />arithmetic mean by dividing the sum of the depths at all stations by the <br /> <br /> <br />number of stations, as illustrated in fig. 2.02. This often is as accu- <br /> <br /> <br />rate as is justified for the purpose or by the basic data. If stations <br /> <br /> <br />are spaced with reasonable uniformity and the individual gage catches <br /> <br /> <br />do not vary widely from the mean, the arithmetic average will usually <br /> <br /> <br />suffice. In most cases, however, the gages are not uniformly spaced, <br /> <br /> <br />and topographic and other influences produce a large variation in the <br /> <br /> <br />areal distribution of precipitation. In such cases, more precise methods <br /> <br /> <br />are required. <br /> <br />Thiessen Method <br /> <br />In the Thiessen method, it is assumed that the amount of precipita- <br /> <br /> <br />tion at any station can be applied halfway to the next station in any <br /> <br /> <br />direction. A weighting process is used by determining the area of influ- <br /> <br /> <br />ence associated with each station and assuming the occurrence of uniform <br /> <br /> <br />precipitation over each of these areas is equal to the measured station <br /> <br />2-04 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.